Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the institutional work that underlies the attempt to institutionalize a more active role of citizens in urban planning. We draw on a case in which a group of citizens aims to redevelop a brownfield site into a vital urban area. This citizens’ initiative is co-creating a new form of urban planning with the municipality, private organizations and individual citizens. The study shows how citizens’ initiatives can be a driver for institutional change, but that uncertainties about new institutions tend to reinforce the maintenance of existing ones. This paradox explains why even if the ambition for a new form of planning is widely shared, actually realizing institutional change can still be difficult and time-consuming.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 72-87 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Planning and Management |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 13 Mar 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- DYNAMICS
- PATH DEPENDENCE
- POLITICS
- citizens' initiatives
- co-creation
- institutional change
- institutional work
- urban planning