Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs

Stijn Neuteleers, Machiel Mulder*, Frank Hindriks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The increase in the supply of intermittent renewable energy and the higher electricity use lead to stronger variation in network usage, which either requires costly network extensions or the implementation of incentives to reduce peaks. This paper focuses on the latter, namely dynamic tariffs. However, a tension may exist between economic arguments for dynamic pricing and people perceiving such pricing as unfair. This paper seeks to assess the fairness of dynamic tariffs through a combination of theoretical and empirical research. Fairness is defined broader than inequality; it is understood more objectively than just people's perceptions and thus requires engagement with ethical theory; and the fairness analysis is not only based on abstract ethical reflection but also on analysing the underlying arguments for people's perceptions. Both the theoretical fairness assessment and the survey among Dutch households reveal that dynamic tariffs are less fair than transport and capacity tariffs and fairer than Ramsey pricing. The fairness of dynamic tariffs depends on implementation conditions such as: clear, non-economic arguments as justification, guarantying basic-needs fulfilment, decreasing perception that ‘peak use is only for the rich’, and increasing predictability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-120
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs
basic needs
incentive
electricity
Electricity
tariff
Economics
economics
energy
analysis
household

Keywords

  • Acceptability
  • Congestion
  • Dynamic prices
  • Fairness
  • Network tariffs
  • Peak pricing

Cite this

Neuteleers, Stijn ; Mulder, Machiel ; Hindriks, Frank. / Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs. In: Energy Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 108. pp. 111-120.
@article{495b01f8eae441fea328ed931186f1dd,
title = "Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs",
abstract = "The increase in the supply of intermittent renewable energy and the higher electricity use lead to stronger variation in network usage, which either requires costly network extensions or the implementation of incentives to reduce peaks. This paper focuses on the latter, namely dynamic tariffs. However, a tension may exist between economic arguments for dynamic pricing and people perceiving such pricing as unfair. This paper seeks to assess the fairness of dynamic tariffs through a combination of theoretical and empirical research. Fairness is defined broader than inequality; it is understood more objectively than just people's perceptions and thus requires engagement with ethical theory; and the fairness analysis is not only based on abstract ethical reflection but also on analysing the underlying arguments for people's perceptions. Both the theoretical fairness assessment and the survey among Dutch households reveal that dynamic tariffs are less fair than transport and capacity tariffs and fairer than Ramsey pricing. The fairness of dynamic tariffs depends on implementation conditions such as: clear, non-economic arguments as justification, guarantying basic-needs fulfilment, decreasing perception that ‘peak use is only for the rich’, and increasing predictability.",
keywords = "Acceptability, Congestion, Dynamic prices, Fairness, Network tariffs, Peak pricing",
author = "Stijn Neuteleers and Machiel Mulder and Frank Hindriks",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.028",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "111--120",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs. / Neuteleers, Stijn; Mulder, Machiel; Hindriks, Frank.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 108, 2017, p. 111-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs

AU - Neuteleers, Stijn

AU - Mulder, Machiel

AU - Hindriks, Frank

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The increase in the supply of intermittent renewable energy and the higher electricity use lead to stronger variation in network usage, which either requires costly network extensions or the implementation of incentives to reduce peaks. This paper focuses on the latter, namely dynamic tariffs. However, a tension may exist between economic arguments for dynamic pricing and people perceiving such pricing as unfair. This paper seeks to assess the fairness of dynamic tariffs through a combination of theoretical and empirical research. Fairness is defined broader than inequality; it is understood more objectively than just people's perceptions and thus requires engagement with ethical theory; and the fairness analysis is not only based on abstract ethical reflection but also on analysing the underlying arguments for people's perceptions. Both the theoretical fairness assessment and the survey among Dutch households reveal that dynamic tariffs are less fair than transport and capacity tariffs and fairer than Ramsey pricing. The fairness of dynamic tariffs depends on implementation conditions such as: clear, non-economic arguments as justification, guarantying basic-needs fulfilment, decreasing perception that ‘peak use is only for the rich’, and increasing predictability.

AB - The increase in the supply of intermittent renewable energy and the higher electricity use lead to stronger variation in network usage, which either requires costly network extensions or the implementation of incentives to reduce peaks. This paper focuses on the latter, namely dynamic tariffs. However, a tension may exist between economic arguments for dynamic pricing and people perceiving such pricing as unfair. This paper seeks to assess the fairness of dynamic tariffs through a combination of theoretical and empirical research. Fairness is defined broader than inequality; it is understood more objectively than just people's perceptions and thus requires engagement with ethical theory; and the fairness analysis is not only based on abstract ethical reflection but also on analysing the underlying arguments for people's perceptions. Both the theoretical fairness assessment and the survey among Dutch households reveal that dynamic tariffs are less fair than transport and capacity tariffs and fairer than Ramsey pricing. The fairness of dynamic tariffs depends on implementation conditions such as: clear, non-economic arguments as justification, guarantying basic-needs fulfilment, decreasing perception that ‘peak use is only for the rich’, and increasing predictability.

KW - Acceptability

KW - Congestion

KW - Dynamic prices

KW - Fairness

KW - Network tariffs

KW - Peak pricing

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.028

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.028

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 111

EP - 120

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -