TY - JOUR
T1 - At your service
T2 - supportiveness of servant leadership, communication frequency and communication channel fostering job satisfaction across generations
AU - Coun, Martine J H
AU - De Ruiter, Melanie
AU - Peters, Pascale
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Coun, De Ruiter and Peters.
PY - 2023/8/31
Y1 - 2023/8/31
N2 - The present study contributes to the conversations on the role of ‘autonomy supportive’ factors in employee wellbeing in remote work contexts by examining the relationships between servant leadership, communication frequency – overall and via synchronous (i.e., individual video-calls, individual telephone calls) and asynchronous communication channels (i.e., e-mail messages, and WhatsApp) – on the one hand, and job satisfaction, on the other, and the moderating role of generation (Baby Boomers and Gen X versus Gen Y) in these relationships.MethodBuilding on self-determination theory, incorporating insights from servant leadership, telework, and media richness and synchronicity literatures, we developed hypotheses that were tested via multilevel analysis (273 employees nested in 89 managers).ResultsIn line with expectations, servant leadership had a positive relationship with job satisfaction. Total communication frequency, however, was not related to job satisfaction. Further analyses per communication channel showed that only level 2 e-mail communication frequency was positively related to job satisfaction. In contrast to expectations, the relationships studied were not moderated by generation.DiscussionWe concluded that, for all generations, both servant leadership and frequent (e-mail) communication can be regarded as ‘autonomy supportive’ factors in employee wellbeing. Paradoxically, whereas servant leadership, considered as a human-centric leadership style, suggests close trust-based employment relationships, employees valued frequent asynchronous communication (via e-mail). Having access to information and knowledge when needed may satisfy employees’ need for autonomy (and perhaps for flexibility to engage in work and non-work activities). The insights gained in our study can inform organizations, managers, and employees, particularly in future remote work contexts.
AB - The present study contributes to the conversations on the role of ‘autonomy supportive’ factors in employee wellbeing in remote work contexts by examining the relationships between servant leadership, communication frequency – overall and via synchronous (i.e., individual video-calls, individual telephone calls) and asynchronous communication channels (i.e., e-mail messages, and WhatsApp) – on the one hand, and job satisfaction, on the other, and the moderating role of generation (Baby Boomers and Gen X versus Gen Y) in these relationships.MethodBuilding on self-determination theory, incorporating insights from servant leadership, telework, and media richness and synchronicity literatures, we developed hypotheses that were tested via multilevel analysis (273 employees nested in 89 managers).ResultsIn line with expectations, servant leadership had a positive relationship with job satisfaction. Total communication frequency, however, was not related to job satisfaction. Further analyses per communication channel showed that only level 2 e-mail communication frequency was positively related to job satisfaction. In contrast to expectations, the relationships studied were not moderated by generation.DiscussionWe concluded that, for all generations, both servant leadership and frequent (e-mail) communication can be regarded as ‘autonomy supportive’ factors in employee wellbeing. Paradoxically, whereas servant leadership, considered as a human-centric leadership style, suggests close trust-based employment relationships, employees valued frequent asynchronous communication (via e-mail). Having access to information and knowledge when needed may satisfy employees’ need for autonomy (and perhaps for flexibility to engage in work and non-work activities). The insights gained in our study can inform organizations, managers, and employees, particularly in future remote work contexts.
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183203
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183203
M3 - Article
C2 - 37720648
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1183203
ER -