Blasphemy in an Age of Corroding Secularity

Jasper Doomen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

‘Sacred’ may be defined in various ways, depending on one’s worldview. In a pluralistic society, a single perspective from which to decide what is sacred seems absent. Yet certain elements are taken to be sacred such that they transcend individual worldviews. Their inviolability entails blasphemy laws, where ‘blasphemy’ extends beyond what is traditionally considered religious, since ‘religion’ itself is not clearly demarcated either. The interests of the sacred may be protected by blasphemy laws, but the downside of such laws is that the freedom of expression is compromised. A balanced view is necessary to accommodate these conflicting interests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-67
Number of pages17
JournalLaw and Critique
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Blasphemy
  • Constitutional law
  • Freedom of expression
  • Sacred

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blasphemy in an Age of Corroding Secularity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this