Blasfemie in de huidige context

Translated title of the contribution: Blasphemy in the current context

J. Doomen, M. van Schaik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we inquire the merits of criminalizing blasphemy. We argue that religious views do not warrant a separate treatment compared to nonreligious ones. In addition, freedom of speech must be balanced against the interest of those who may be aggrieved by blasphemous remarks. We conclude that penalizing blasphemy is undesirable. It is fortunate, in that light, that acts of blasphemy have recently been decriminalized in The Netherlands by removing blasphemy as an offense from the Criminal Code. Still, other provisions appear to leave enough room to reach the same result, making the removal a possibly virtually aesthetic change. In the international context, it would be regrettable for The Netherlands to forgo the opportunity to take a leading role
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)47-61
Number of pages15
JournalNetherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Netherlands
freedom of opinion
aesthetics
offense

Cite this

@article{cd2b71b856ec4173b475411f5f386b0d,
title = "Blasfemie in de huidige context",
abstract = "In this article, we inquire the merits of criminalizing blasphemy. We argue that religious views do not warrant a separate treatment compared to nonreligious ones. In addition, freedom of speech must be balanced against the interest of those who may be aggrieved by blasphemous remarks. We conclude that penalizing blasphemy is undesirable. It is fortunate, in that light, that acts of blasphemy have recently been decriminalized in The Netherlands by removing blasphemy as an offense from the Criminal Code. Still, other provisions appear to leave enough room to reach the same result, making the removal a possibly virtually aesthetic change. In the international context, it would be regrettable for The Netherlands to forgo the opportunity to take a leading role",
author = "J. Doomen and {van Schaik}, M.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5553/NJLP/.000016",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "44",
pages = "47--61",
journal = "Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy",
issn = "2213-0713",
number = "1",

}

Blasfemie in de huidige context. / Doomen, J.; van Schaik, M.

In: Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2015, p. 47-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blasfemie in de huidige context

AU - Doomen, J.

AU - van Schaik, M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this article, we inquire the merits of criminalizing blasphemy. We argue that religious views do not warrant a separate treatment compared to nonreligious ones. In addition, freedom of speech must be balanced against the interest of those who may be aggrieved by blasphemous remarks. We conclude that penalizing blasphemy is undesirable. It is fortunate, in that light, that acts of blasphemy have recently been decriminalized in The Netherlands by removing blasphemy as an offense from the Criminal Code. Still, other provisions appear to leave enough room to reach the same result, making the removal a possibly virtually aesthetic change. In the international context, it would be regrettable for The Netherlands to forgo the opportunity to take a leading role

AB - In this article, we inquire the merits of criminalizing blasphemy. We argue that religious views do not warrant a separate treatment compared to nonreligious ones. In addition, freedom of speech must be balanced against the interest of those who may be aggrieved by blasphemous remarks. We conclude that penalizing blasphemy is undesirable. It is fortunate, in that light, that acts of blasphemy have recently been decriminalized in The Netherlands by removing blasphemy as an offense from the Criminal Code. Still, other provisions appear to leave enough room to reach the same result, making the removal a possibly virtually aesthetic change. In the international context, it would be regrettable for The Netherlands to forgo the opportunity to take a leading role

U2 - 10.5553/NJLP/.000016

DO - 10.5553/NJLP/.000016

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 47

EP - 61

JO - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy

JF - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy

SN - 2213-0713

IS - 1

ER -