Abstract
Past research shows that teams working on a complex task need developmental space to be successful. They can create this space in their interaction by undertaking four activities: creating future, reflecting, organizing, and dialoguing. These four activities refer to two orientations: the performance orientation, limiting the space, and the sensemaking orientation, opening up the space. Teams need them both, yet it seems inconsistent and impossible to achieve together, thus a paradox. In this exploratory research, we address the way in which teams experience and handle that "developmental space paradox," and how it affects team success. Individual team members (N = 70) from 12 teams were interviewed. Successful (n = 7) and unsuccessful (n = 5) teams were compared. The results show that successful teams experience this paradox differently than the unsuccessful teams, and that both categories choose other coping strategies to handle this paradox.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 366-380 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Management Inquiry |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Keywords
- DIVERSITY
- FAULTLINES
- IDENTIFICATION
- INNOVATION
- MANAGEMENT
- MODEL
- ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY
- SUBGROUPS
- TASK COMPLEXITY
- WORKING
- dynamics
- group decision making
- group processes
- groups
- teams