Abstract
Past research shows that teams working on a complex task need developmental space to be successful. They can create this space in their interaction by undertaking four activities: creating future, reflecting, organizing, and dialoguing. These four activities refer to two orientations: the performance orientation, limiting the space, and the sensemaking orientation, opening up the space. Teams need them both, yet it seems inconsistent and impossible to achieve together, thus a paradox. In this exploratory research, we address the way in which teams experience and handle that "developmental space paradox," and how it affects team success. Individual team members (N = 70) from 12 teams were interviewed. Successful (n = 7) and unsuccessful (n = 5) teams were compared. The results show that successful teams experience this paradox differently than the unsuccessful teams, and that both categories choose other coping strategies to handle this paradox.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 366-380 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Management Inquiry |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Keywords
- DIVERSITY
- FAULTLINES
- IDENTIFICATION
- INNOVATION
- MANAGEMENT
- MODEL
- ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY
- SUBGROUPS
- TASK COMPLEXITY
- WORKING
- dynamics
- group decision making
- group processes
- groups
- teams