Abstract
Based on extensive literature research and 11 expert interviews with academics familiar with the field of audience studies and mediation of distant suffering, this article provides a metadiscussion of the different paradigms and methodologies that can be used for further empirical audience research. It is argued that the “middle-way” paradigms such as critical realism, grounded theory, and pragmatism can productively serve as the basis for a common epistemic language in interdisciplinary research. A mixed-methods approach may serve well for a broad and holistic study of the audience. It is further argued that future empirical research of media users in relation to distant suffering could benefit from an interdisciplinary, mixed-methods approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4324-4344 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | International Journal of Communication |
Volume | 10 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |