Chronotype, sleep quality and sleep duration in adult distance education: Not related to study progress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research in traditional education shows chronotype, sleep duration and sleep quality to be related to learning performance. Research in adult students participating in distance education (DE) is scarce. This study aims to provide knowledge on these relationships in this educational setting. In an observational longitudinal study, chronotype, sleep duration (i.e., for work and free days separately) and sleep quality of 894 students were analyzed in a multiple regression analyses. Students provided information on sleep-relatedmeasures and important covariates at the start of their study and study progress was evaluated after 14 months (i.e., the number of successfully completed modules). In linewith previous research, chronotype did not predict study progress. Further, sleep duration did not predict study progress, neither as a linear nor as a polynomial term. Third, sleep quality did not predict study progress. Concluding, these results are in linewith previous research that DE provides a solution to the asynchrony problem. Findings regarding sleep duration and sleep quality are new and unexpected, asking for attention and further research. Despite the study's observational nature, findings suggest that students participating in DE may benefit from this type of education as the asynchrony problem appears not to apply here, as students can choose their own study schedule.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-52
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume44
Early online date21 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Distance Education
Sleep
Students
Research
Observational Studies
Education
Longitudinal Studies
Appointments and Schedules
Regression Analysis
Learning

Keywords

  • Online learning
  • Distance learning
  • Learning performance
  • The ALOUD study
  • Asynchrony problem

Cite this

@article{ff020b0e5a2d452190915fb67fd8d4f0,
title = "Chronotype, sleep quality and sleep duration in adult distance education: Not related to study progress",
abstract = "Research in traditional education shows chronotype, sleep duration and sleep quality to be related to learning performance. Research in adult students participating in distance education (DE) is scarce. This study aims to provide knowledge on these relationships in this educational setting. In an observational longitudinal study, chronotype, sleep duration (i.e., for work and free days separately) and sleep quality of 894 students were analyzed in a multiple regression analyses. Students provided information on sleep-relatedmeasures and important covariates at the start of their study and study progress was evaluated after 14 months (i.e., the number of successfully completed modules). In linewith previous research, chronotype did not predict study progress. Further, sleep duration did not predict study progress, neither as a linear nor as a polynomial term. Third, sleep quality did not predict study progress. Concluding, these results are in linewith previous research that DE provides a solution to the asynchrony problem. Findings regarding sleep duration and sleep quality are new and unexpected, asking for attention and further research. Despite the study's observational nature, findings suggest that students participating in DE may benefit from this type of education as the asynchrony problem appears not to apply here, as students can choose their own study schedule.",
keywords = "Online learning, Distance learning, Learning performance, The ALOUD study, Asynchrony problem",
author = "J{\'e}r{\^o}me Gijselaers and Kirschner, {Paul A.} and {De Groot}, Renate",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "46--52",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
publisher = "Learning and Individual Differences",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronotype, sleep quality and sleep duration in adult distance education: Not related to study progress

AU - Gijselaers, Jérôme

AU - Kirschner, Paul A.

AU - De Groot, Renate

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Research in traditional education shows chronotype, sleep duration and sleep quality to be related to learning performance. Research in adult students participating in distance education (DE) is scarce. This study aims to provide knowledge on these relationships in this educational setting. In an observational longitudinal study, chronotype, sleep duration (i.e., for work and free days separately) and sleep quality of 894 students were analyzed in a multiple regression analyses. Students provided information on sleep-relatedmeasures and important covariates at the start of their study and study progress was evaluated after 14 months (i.e., the number of successfully completed modules). In linewith previous research, chronotype did not predict study progress. Further, sleep duration did not predict study progress, neither as a linear nor as a polynomial term. Third, sleep quality did not predict study progress. Concluding, these results are in linewith previous research that DE provides a solution to the asynchrony problem. Findings regarding sleep duration and sleep quality are new and unexpected, asking for attention and further research. Despite the study's observational nature, findings suggest that students participating in DE may benefit from this type of education as the asynchrony problem appears not to apply here, as students can choose their own study schedule.

AB - Research in traditional education shows chronotype, sleep duration and sleep quality to be related to learning performance. Research in adult students participating in distance education (DE) is scarce. This study aims to provide knowledge on these relationships in this educational setting. In an observational longitudinal study, chronotype, sleep duration (i.e., for work and free days separately) and sleep quality of 894 students were analyzed in a multiple regression analyses. Students provided information on sleep-relatedmeasures and important covariates at the start of their study and study progress was evaluated after 14 months (i.e., the number of successfully completed modules). In linewith previous research, chronotype did not predict study progress. Further, sleep duration did not predict study progress, neither as a linear nor as a polynomial term. Third, sleep quality did not predict study progress. Concluding, these results are in linewith previous research that DE provides a solution to the asynchrony problem. Findings regarding sleep duration and sleep quality are new and unexpected, asking for attention and further research. Despite the study's observational nature, findings suggest that students participating in DE may benefit from this type of education as the asynchrony problem appears not to apply here, as students can choose their own study schedule.

KW - Online learning

KW - Distance learning

KW - Learning performance

KW - The ALOUD study

KW - Asynchrony problem

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 46

EP - 52

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

ER -