Cognitive Biases in Critical Decisions Facing SME Entrepreneurs: An External Accountants’ Perspective

A.L.P. Nuijten, Nick Benschop, Antoinette Rijsenbilt, Kristinka Wilmink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Decisions by small and medium enterprise (SME) entrepreneurs are plagued by a variety of cognitive biases. Extant literature has mainly focused on a limited number of important biases (e.g., overconfidence) in a handful of important entrepreneurial decisions (e.g., start-up, market entry or exit). However, putting the spotlight on a few important biases and entrepreneurial decisions could leave other important biases and decisions underexposed. SME accountants are in a unique position to shed a broader light on this issue. SME entrepreneurs often seek advice of their accountants when they struggle with decisions that involve uncertainty and business risks in the domains of strategy, regulatory compliance, human resources, IT, and succession. In this study, we explore 12 different biases and analyze whether their importance can change across these decision domains. Interviews were performed with 14 SME accountants who provide an independent third-party view on decision making by over 3000 entrepreneurs. Our findings suggest that the importance of most of these biases varies from one decision domain to the other. We also identified four approaches (warn, inform, intervene, and coach) that accountants can take when entrepreneurs may fall victim to biases. We discuss the implications for research and practice of SME entrepreneurs and their accountants.
Original languageEnglish
Article number89
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalAdministrative sciences
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • SME entrepreneurs
  • accountants
  • cognitive biases
  • decision making
  • debiasing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive Biases in Critical Decisions Facing SME Entrepreneurs: An External Accountants’ Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this