Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review

Margot Barry, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Loek Nieuwenhuis, Nynke Scherpbier-de Haan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: This literature review investigates what research reports about the contribution that communities of practice (CoPs) can make in the continuing professional development (CPD) of qualified occupational therapists. Methods: Academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and ERIC) were searched and articles were included based on pre-determined criteria. Five articles were included in the review. Results: The CoPs in the reviewed articles provided opportunities for knowledge sharing, knowledge translation, reflection on action and learning through boundary crossing. The presence of professionals with diverse perspectives was an important ingredient that facilitated CPD. Conclusion: Research into the use of CoPs in occupational therapy is sparse. CoPs could provide a CPD forum for occupational therapists whether online or face to face. Practitioners are encouraged to participate in CoPs
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-193
JournalAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
MEDLINE
Learning
Databases
Research
Occupational Therapists

Keywords

  • contemporary practice issues,
  • learning
  • occupational therapy research.

Cite this

@article{8d43f56fab26461a857abf5b829e8a5b,
title = "Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review",
abstract = "Background: This literature review investigates what research reports about the contribution that communities of practice (CoPs) can make in the continuing professional development (CPD) of qualified occupational therapists. Methods: Academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and ERIC) were searched and articles were included based on pre-determined criteria. Five articles were included in the review. Results: The CoPs in the reviewed articles provided opportunities for knowledge sharing, knowledge translation, reflection on action and learning through boundary crossing. The presence of professionals with diverse perspectives was an important ingredient that facilitated CPD. Conclusion: Research into the use of CoPs in occupational therapy is sparse. CoPs could provide a CPD forum for occupational therapists whether online or face to face. Practitioners are encouraged to participate in CoPs",
keywords = "contemporary practice issues,, learning, occupational therapy research.",
author = "Margot Barry and Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink and Loek Nieuwenhuis and {Scherpbier-de Haan}, Nynke",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/1440-1630.12334",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "185--193",
journal = "Australian Occupational Therapy Journal",
issn = "0045-0766",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia",
number = "2",

}

Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review. / Barry, Margot; Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske; Nieuwenhuis, Loek; Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke.

In: Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2017, p. 185-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communities of practice: A means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review

AU - Barry, Margot

AU - Kuijer-Siebelink, Wietske

AU - Nieuwenhuis, Loek

AU - Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: This literature review investigates what research reports about the contribution that communities of practice (CoPs) can make in the continuing professional development (CPD) of qualified occupational therapists. Methods: Academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and ERIC) were searched and articles were included based on pre-determined criteria. Five articles were included in the review. Results: The CoPs in the reviewed articles provided opportunities for knowledge sharing, knowledge translation, reflection on action and learning through boundary crossing. The presence of professionals with diverse perspectives was an important ingredient that facilitated CPD. Conclusion: Research into the use of CoPs in occupational therapy is sparse. CoPs could provide a CPD forum for occupational therapists whether online or face to face. Practitioners are encouraged to participate in CoPs

AB - Background: This literature review investigates what research reports about the contribution that communities of practice (CoPs) can make in the continuing professional development (CPD) of qualified occupational therapists. Methods: Academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and ERIC) were searched and articles were included based on pre-determined criteria. Five articles were included in the review. Results: The CoPs in the reviewed articles provided opportunities for knowledge sharing, knowledge translation, reflection on action and learning through boundary crossing. The presence of professionals with diverse perspectives was an important ingredient that facilitated CPD. Conclusion: Research into the use of CoPs in occupational therapy is sparse. CoPs could provide a CPD forum for occupational therapists whether online or face to face. Practitioners are encouraged to participate in CoPs

KW - contemporary practice issues,

KW - learning

KW - occupational therapy research.

U2 - 10.1111/1440-1630.12334

DO - 10.1111/1440-1630.12334

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 185

EP - 193

JO - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

JF - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

SN - 0045-0766

IS - 2

ER -