Abstract
Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors discovered a typographical error in the method section under the inclusion criteria subsection. The text “[the] inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) aged 16-65 years” should read “[the] inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) aged 15-65 years”. The authors were granted ethical approval for this age range by the MERC at Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands reference: (NL46439.068.13) and the University Clinical Leuven, Belgium (reference: B322201629214). The typographical error therefore has had no implications for the RCT.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 538 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Trials |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Aug 2021 |