Correction to: Spirituality as a Predictor of Well-Being, Mental Distress or Both: A Four-Week Follow-Up Study in a Sample of Dutch and Belgian Adults (Religions, (2024), 15, 2, (179), 10.3390/rel15020179)

Thijs Huijs*, Arjan W. Braam, Renske Kruizinga, Nele Jacobs, Jennifer Reijnders, Marianne Simons

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalErratum / corrigendum / retractionsAcademic

Abstract

In the original publication (Huijs et al. 2024), there was a mistake in Table 3. The minus sign is missing in some figures. Corrected Table 3 appears below. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 1. 1 1 = woman; 2 1 = none; 3 Regardless of hours; 4 scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; 5 kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; R2 = R square; β = standardized regression coefficient. In the original publication (Huijs et al. 2024), there was a mistake in Table 5. The minus sign is missing in some figures. Corrected Table 5 appears below. The table shows the results of the stepwise hierarchical regression analysis for Hypothesis 2. 1 1 = woman; 2 1 = none; 3 Regardless of hours; 4 Education, scientific = higher vocational education, bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or postdoctoral degree; 5 kids, yes = at least one minor living at home (i.e., child). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. β standardized regression coefficient. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number602
JournalReligions
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Spirituality as a Predictor of Well-Being, Mental Distress or Both: A Four-Week Follow-Up Study in a Sample of Dutch and Belgian Adults (Religions, (2024), 15, 2, (179), 10.3390/rel15020179)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this