Cueing for transfer in multimedia programmes: process worksheets vs. worked‐out examples

Hans Hummel; Fred Paas; Rob Koper

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x

Cueing for transfer in multimedia programmes: process worksheets vs. worked‐out examples

Hans Hummel^*, Fred Paas, Rob Koper

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

We investigate the effects of cueing, in a multimedia programme for the individualized training of the ‘whole task’ to prepare a plea, on the learning outcomes of 43 sophomore law students. The cueing formats of worked-out examples (WOEs), process worksheets (PWs),and both WOE and PW are compared to a no-cueing control condition. Our hypotheses that WOE enhance near transfer, by stimulating imitation processes to similar tasks, and that PW foster far transfer, by stimulating mindful abstraction processes to different tasks were partly confirmed by learning outcomes on the training task and two transfer tasks.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	387-397
Number of pages	11
Journal	Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Volume	20
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x
Publication status	Published - Oct 2004

Keywords

cueing
transfer
worked-out examples
process worksheets
schema-based learning

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cueing for transfer in multimedia programmes: process worksheets vs. worked‐out examples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{a1ebfc381aca4e13ad6a89a6c36a2584,

title = "Cueing for transfer in multimedia programmes: process worksheets vs. worked‐out examples",

abstract = "We investigate the effects of cueing, in a multimedia programme for the individualized training of the {\textquoteleft}whole task{\textquoteright} to prepare a plea, on the learning outcomes of 43 sophomore law students. The cueing formats of worked-out examples (WOEs), process worksheets (PWs),and both WOE and PW are compared to a no-cueing control condition. Our hypotheses that WOE enhance near transfer, by stimulating imitation processes to similar tasks, and that PW foster far transfer, by stimulating mindful abstraction processes to different tasks were partly confirmed by learning outcomes on the training task and two transfer tasks.",

keywords = "cueing, transfer, worked-out examples, process worksheets, schema-based learning",

author = "Hans Hummel and Fred Paas and Rob Koper",

note = "DS_Description: Published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (5), 387–397 (2005)",

year = "2004",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "387--397",

journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Learning",

issn = "0266-4909",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cueing for transfer in multimedia programmes

T2 - process worksheets vs. worked‐out examples

AU - Hummel, Hans

AU - Paas, Fred

AU - Koper, Rob

N1 - DS_Description: Published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (5), 387–397 (2005)

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - We investigate the effects of cueing, in a multimedia programme for the individualized training of the ‘whole task’ to prepare a plea, on the learning outcomes of 43 sophomore law students. The cueing formats of worked-out examples (WOEs), process worksheets (PWs),and both WOE and PW are compared to a no-cueing control condition. Our hypotheses that WOE enhance near transfer, by stimulating imitation processes to similar tasks, and that PW foster far transfer, by stimulating mindful abstraction processes to different tasks were partly confirmed by learning outcomes on the training task and two transfer tasks.

AB - We investigate the effects of cueing, in a multimedia programme for the individualized training of the ‘whole task’ to prepare a plea, on the learning outcomes of 43 sophomore law students. The cueing formats of worked-out examples (WOEs), process worksheets (PWs),and both WOE and PW are compared to a no-cueing control condition. Our hypotheses that WOE enhance near transfer, by stimulating imitation processes to similar tasks, and that PW foster far transfer, by stimulating mindful abstraction processes to different tasks were partly confirmed by learning outcomes on the training task and two transfer tasks.

KW - cueing

KW - transfer

KW - worked-out examples

KW - process worksheets

KW - schema-based learning

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00098.x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 387

EP - 397

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

SN - 0266-4909

IS - 5

ER -