D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2

Barbara Bazzanella; Milena Casagranda; Andrea Molinari; Sarah Humphreys; Gareth Sleightholme; Olivier Lepoivre; Maureen Halbeher; Ana Romano; Carla Falua; Cristina Soeiro; Raquel Guerra; Martin van Kollenburg; Rob Kommeren

D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2

Barbara Bazzanella, Milena Casagranda, Andrea Molinari, Sarah Humphreys, Gareth Sleightholme, Olivier Lepoivre, Maureen Halbeher, Ana Romano, Carla Falua, Cristina Soeiro, Raquel Guerra, Martin van Kollenburg, Rob Kommeren

Research output: Book/Report › Deliverable

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this deliverable, we discuss the implementation details of the second round of pilots led by WP5 partners (Okkam, HCUK, SPL, EPJ, and RANDST) to test the serious games created by game developers with RAGE ecosystem’s assets. The document presents for each partner the validation experiments conducted between December 2017 and November 2018, with details related to design, methodology and instruments used in the different experiments. In addition, details about the implementation and participants will be provided, together with a discussion about risk management for each partner respect the execution of the game. The results presented in this document must be complemented with those reported in D8.4, Second Evaluation Report, where the analysis of scientific aspects is presented. D5.4 can be read as the premise to D8.4 where the results of the evaluation are detailed and a comparison between pilot 1 and pilot 2 is discussed.

Original language	English
Publisher	RAGE project
Number of pages	45
Publication status	Published - 2018
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

RAGE
pilot evaluation
serious games pilot

Access to Document

D5.4 Pilots quality report round 2Final published version, 1.69 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-SA

Rage: Realising an Applied Gaming Eco-system
Westera, W. (PI), Georgiadis, K. (CoI), Saveski, G. (CoI), van Lankveld, G. (CoI), Bahreini, K. (CoI), van der Vegt, W. (CoI), Berkhout, J. (CoI), Nyamsuren, E. (CoI), Kluijfhout, E. (CoI) & Nadolski, R. (CoI)
European Union
1/02/15 → 31/07/19
Project: Research

Cite this

@book{9adfb17e191145888fa1ff6953b44063,

title = "D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2",

abstract = "In this deliverable, we discuss the implementation details of the second round of pilots led by WP5 partners (Okkam, HCUK, SPL, EPJ, and RANDST) to test the serious games created by game developers with RAGE ecosystem{\textquoteright}s assets. The document presents for each partner the validation experiments conducted between December 2017 and November 2018, with details related to design, methodology and instruments used in the different experiments. In addition, details about the implementation and participants will be provided, together with a discussion about risk management for each partner respect the execution of the game. The results presented in this document must be complemented with those reported in D8.4, Second Evaluation Report, where the analysis of scientific aspects is presented. D5.4 can be read as the premise to D8.4 where the results of the evaluation are detailed and a comparison between pilot 1 and pilot 2 is discussed.",

keywords = "RAGE, pilot evaluation, serious games pilot",

author = "Barbara Bazzanella and Milena Casagranda and Andrea Molinari and Sarah Humphreys and Gareth Sleightholme and Olivier Lepoivre and Maureen Halbeher and Ana Romano and Carla Falua and Cristina Soeiro and Raquel Guerra and {van Kollenburg}, Martin and Rob Kommeren",

note = "This publication reflects only the author's view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

publisher = "RAGE project",

address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2

AU - Bazzanella, Barbara

AU - Casagranda, Milena

AU - Molinari, Andrea

AU - Humphreys, Sarah

AU - Sleightholme, Gareth

AU - Lepoivre, Olivier

AU - Halbeher, Maureen

AU - Romano, Ana

AU - Falua, Carla

AU - Soeiro, Cristina

AU - Guerra, Raquel

AU - van Kollenburg, Martin

AU - Kommeren, Rob

N1 - This publication reflects only the author's view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this deliverable, we discuss the implementation details of the second round of pilots led by WP5 partners (Okkam, HCUK, SPL, EPJ, and RANDST) to test the serious games created by game developers with RAGE ecosystem’s assets. The document presents for each partner the validation experiments conducted between December 2017 and November 2018, with details related to design, methodology and instruments used in the different experiments. In addition, details about the implementation and participants will be provided, together with a discussion about risk management for each partner respect the execution of the game. The results presented in this document must be complemented with those reported in D8.4, Second Evaluation Report, where the analysis of scientific aspects is presented. D5.4 can be read as the premise to D8.4 where the results of the evaluation are detailed and a comparison between pilot 1 and pilot 2 is discussed.

AB - In this deliverable, we discuss the implementation details of the second round of pilots led by WP5 partners (Okkam, HCUK, SPL, EPJ, and RANDST) to test the serious games created by game developers with RAGE ecosystem’s assets. The document presents for each partner the validation experiments conducted between December 2017 and November 2018, with details related to design, methodology and instruments used in the different experiments. In addition, details about the implementation and participants will be provided, together with a discussion about risk management for each partner respect the execution of the game. The results presented in this document must be complemented with those reported in D8.4, Second Evaluation Report, where the analysis of scientific aspects is presented. D5.4 can be read as the premise to D8.4 where the results of the evaluation are detailed and a comparison between pilot 1 and pilot 2 is discussed.

KW - RAGE

KW - pilot evaluation

KW - serious games pilot

M3 - Deliverable

BT - D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2

PB - RAGE project

ER -

D5.4 – Pilots quality report round 2

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Rage: Realising an Applied Gaming Eco-system

Cite this