Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigated the effects of prior attitudes on how students deal with conflicting information in multiple nonlinear texts. Sixty-one Dutch 11th grade students read multiple texts on a controversial topic and wrote a short essay on it. These essays were scored on perspective taken and the origin of information included in them. Ordinal regression analysis showed that students with strong prior attitudes were significantly more likely to write essays that were biased towards their prior attitudes. Furthermore, multiple regression analyses revealed that students with strong attitudes took explicit stances and added large proportions of information not presented in the reading materials in their essays, whereas students with neutral attitudes wrote syntheses and borrowed more information from the materials. Overall, results show that prior attitudes can bias how students deal with conflicting information in an open-ended reading and writing task.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-111
    Number of pages11
    JournalComputers in Human Behavior
    Volume32
    Early online date21 Dec 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Keywords

    • Conflicting information
    • Multiple texts
    • Nonlinear text
    • Prior attitudes

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this