Abstract
Objective: The first objective was to assess the psychometric properties of the 92-item Dutch Naming Test (DNT-92), developed
to assess word finding difficulties in people with aphasia, using Item Response Theory (IRT). The second objective was to select
suitable items for a short version with a discriminative purpose.
Method: This study has a retrospective, psychometric research design, in which 510 DNT-92-forms of people with aphasia and
192 DNT-forms of healthy participants were used for analyses. An IRT analysis was performed and information on the item- and
person parameters was obtained. Item selection for the short version was based on a combination of the discriminative ability of
the items and their estimated theta or difficulty. Items with the highest information load, and a difficulty parameter in the range
of overlap between the sample of people with aphasia and healthy participants were selected.
Results: A 2-PL IRT analysis showed best fit to the data. Assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence, and
monotonicity were met. Items were removed incrementally, whilst checking sensitivity and specificity of the remaining short
form. A selection of six items proved optimal in terms of sensitivity and specificity, with an area under the curve value of 0.85.
Differences were found between participants younger than 70 and older.
Conclusions: The IRT assumptions for the DNT-92 were met, indicating that the test has good psychometric properties. A
reduction of items to just six items proved possible, leading to a reliable six item short form with a discriminatory purpose.
to assess word finding difficulties in people with aphasia, using Item Response Theory (IRT). The second objective was to select
suitable items for a short version with a discriminative purpose.
Method: This study has a retrospective, psychometric research design, in which 510 DNT-92-forms of people with aphasia and
192 DNT-forms of healthy participants were used for analyses. An IRT analysis was performed and information on the item- and
person parameters was obtained. Item selection for the short version was based on a combination of the discriminative ability of
the items and their estimated theta or difficulty. Items with the highest information load, and a difficulty parameter in the range
of overlap between the sample of people with aphasia and healthy participants were selected.
Results: A 2-PL IRT analysis showed best fit to the data. Assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence, and
monotonicity were met. Items were removed incrementally, whilst checking sensitivity and specificity of the remaining short
form. A selection of six items proved optimal in terms of sensitivity and specificity, with an area under the curve value of 0.85.
Differences were found between participants younger than 70 and older.
Conclusions: The IRT assumptions for the DNT-92 were met, indicating that the test has good psychometric properties. A
reduction of items to just six items proved possible, leading to a reliable six item short form with a discriminatory purpose.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | acac057 |
Pages (from-to) | 1735–1748 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 24 Jul 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- ABILITY
- Anomia
- Aphasia
- Aphasia; Anomia; Item response theory; Differential item functioning; Language tests
- Differential item functioning
- Item response theory
- Language tests
- NORMATIVE DATA
- R PACKAGE
- VERSION