Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED

B. Agarwal; C.C.J. Urlings; G. van Lankveld; R. Klemke

Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pervading our lives in numerous ways today. It is important to apply ethical principles to guide the development and usage of AI systems to prevent harms or discrimination through AI algorithms. This has led to various ethical regulations and guidelines being formed at the corporate, national and supra-national level. The EU AI Act classifies the usage of AI in education as 'high-risk' as “such systems may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination” [1, p. 26]. However, there has been little attention paid to ethics in AI in Education (AIED) in literature and there is only one existing framework to ethically guide AIED. AIED ethics is complex as it has to combine both general AI ethics and the ethics of educational technology. We aim to create a theoretical framework for AIED, comprising implementation guidelines for developers and organizational users of AI in education. In this paper, an existing draft framework by Holmes et al. is adapted by using insights from literature in the ethics of AI, ethics of educational technology and ethics of AIED.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning
Editors	Iona Jivet, Daniele Di Mitri, Jan Schneider, Zacharoula Papamitsiou, Mikhal Fominykh
Place of Publication	Toulouse
Publisher	CEUR-WS.org
Pages	46-54
Number of pages	9
Volume	3292
ISBN (Electronic)	1613-0073
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2022
Event	17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning - Toulouse, France Duration: 12 Sept 2022 → 16 Sept 2022

Publication series

Series	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume	3292
ISSN	1613-0073

Conference

Conference	17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning
Abbreviated title	EC-TEL2022
Country/Territory	France
City	Toulouse
Period	12/09/22 → 16/09/22

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence
Education
Ethics

Access to Document

https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3292/DCECTEL2022_paper06.pdfLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Agarwal, B., Urlings, C. C. J., van Lankveld, G., & Klemke, R. (2022). Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED. In I. Jivet, D. Di Mitri, J. Schneider, Z. Papamitsiou, & M. Fominykh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 3292, pp. 46-54). CEUR-WS.org. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3292/DCECTEL2022_paper06.pdf

Agarwal, B. ; Urlings, C.C.J. ; van Lankveld, G. et al. / Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED. Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. editor / Iona Jivet ; Daniele Di Mitri ; Jan Schneider ; Zacharoula Papamitsiou ; Mikhal Fominykh. Vol. 3292 Toulouse : CEUR-WS.org, 2022. pp. 46-54 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3292).

@inbook{05ec9cf01026417d82a38a6ce6a1b058,

title = "Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED",

abstract = "Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pervading our lives in numerous ways today. It is important to apply ethical principles to guide the development and usage of AI systems to prevent harms or discrimination through AI algorithms. This has led to various ethical regulations and guidelines being formed at the corporate, national and supra-national level. The EU AI Act classifies the usage of AI in education as 'high-risk' as “such systems may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination” [1, p. 26]. However, there has been little attention paid to ethics in AI in Education (AIED) in literature and there is only one existing framework to ethically guide AIED. AIED ethics is complex as it has to combine both general AI ethics and the ethics of educational technology. We aim to create a theoretical framework for AIED, comprising implementation guidelines for developers and organizational users of AI in education. In this paper, an existing draft framework by Holmes et al. is adapted by using insights from literature in the ethics of AI, ethics of educational technology and ethics of AIED.",

keywords = "Artificial Intelligence, Education, Ethics",

author = "B. Agarwal and C.C.J. Urlings and \{van Lankveld\}, G. and R. Klemke",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "3292",

series = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

publisher = "CEUR-WS.org",

pages = "46--54",

editor = "Iona Jivet and \{Di Mitri\}, Daniele and Schneider, \{Jan \} and Zacharoula Papamitsiou and Mikhal Fominykh",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning",

address = "Germany",

note = "17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL2022 ; Conference date: 12-09-2022 Through 16-09-2022",

}

Agarwal, B , Urlings, CCJ , van Lankveld, G & Klemke, R 2022, Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED. in I Jivet, D Di Mitri, J Schneider, Z Papamitsiou & M Fominykh (eds), Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. vol. 3292, CEUR-WS.org, Toulouse, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 3292, pp. 46-54, 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Toulouse, France, 12/09/22. <https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3292/DCECTEL2022_paper06.pdf>

Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED. / Agarwal, B.; Urlings, C.C.J.; van Lankveld, G. et al.
Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. ed. / Iona Jivet; Daniele Di Mitri; Jan Schneider; Zacharoula Papamitsiou; Mikhal Fominykh. Vol. 3292 Toulouse: CEUR-WS.org, 2022. p. 46-54 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3292).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED

AU - Agarwal, B.

AU - Urlings, C.C.J.

AU - van Lankveld, G.

AU - Klemke, R.

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pervading our lives in numerous ways today. It is important to apply ethical principles to guide the development and usage of AI systems to prevent harms or discrimination through AI algorithms. This has led to various ethical regulations and guidelines being formed at the corporate, national and supra-national level. The EU AI Act classifies the usage of AI in education as 'high-risk' as “such systems may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination” [1, p. 26]. However, there has been little attention paid to ethics in AI in Education (AIED) in literature and there is only one existing framework to ethically guide AIED. AIED ethics is complex as it has to combine both general AI ethics and the ethics of educational technology. We aim to create a theoretical framework for AIED, comprising implementation guidelines for developers and organizational users of AI in education. In this paper, an existing draft framework by Holmes et al. is adapted by using insights from literature in the ethics of AI, ethics of educational technology and ethics of AIED.

AB - Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pervading our lives in numerous ways today. It is important to apply ethical principles to guide the development and usage of AI systems to prevent harms or discrimination through AI algorithms. This has led to various ethical regulations and guidelines being formed at the corporate, national and supra-national level. The EU AI Act classifies the usage of AI in education as 'high-risk' as “such systems may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination” [1, p. 26]. However, there has been little attention paid to ethics in AI in Education (AIED) in literature and there is only one existing framework to ethically guide AIED. AIED ethics is complex as it has to combine both general AI ethics and the ethics of educational technology. We aim to create a theoretical framework for AIED, comprising implementation guidelines for developers and organizational users of AI in education. In this paper, an existing draft framework by Holmes et al. is adapted by using insights from literature in the ethics of AI, ethics of educational technology and ethics of AIED.

KW - Artificial Intelligence

KW - Education

KW - Ethics

UR - https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3292/

M3 - Chapter

VL - 3292

T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

SP - 46

EP - 54

BT - Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning

A2 - Jivet, Iona

A2 - Di Mitri, Daniele

A2 - Schneider, Jan

A2 - Papamitsiou, Zacharoula

A2 - Fominykh, Mikhal

PB - CEUR-WS.org

CY - Toulouse

T2 - 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning

Y2 - 12 September 2022 through 16 September 2022

ER -

Agarwal B , Urlings CCJ , van Lankveld G , Klemke R. Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED. In Jivet I, Di Mitri D, Schneider J, Papamitsiou Z, Fominykh M, editors, Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the 17th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Vol. 3292. Toulouse: CEUR-WS.org. 2022. p. 46-54. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3292).

Ethical FRAPPE – an adapted draft framework for ethical AIED

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this