Evaluating software testing techniques and tools

Tanja Vos*, Beatriz Marín, Ignacio Panach, Arthur Baars, Claudia Ayala, Xavier Franch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Article in proceedingAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Case studies can help companies to evaluate the benefits of testing techniques and tools before their possible incorporation into the testing processes. Although general guidelines and organizational frameworks exist describing what a case study should consist of, no general methodological framework exists that can be instantiated to easily design case studies to evaluate different testing techniques. In this paper we define a first version of a general methodological framework for evaluating software testing techniques, that focusses on the evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency. Using this framework, (1) software testing practitioners can more easily define case studies through an instantiation of the framework, (2) results can be better compared since they are all executed according to a similar design, and (3) the gap in existing work on methodological evaluation frameworks will be narrowed. 2011

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationActas de las 16th Jornadas de Ingenieria del Software y Bases de Datos, JISBD 2011
Pages531-536
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event16th Conference on Software Engineering and Databases, JISBD 2011 - La Coruna, Spain
Duration: 5 Sept 20117 Sept 2011

Publication series

SeriesActas de Jornadas de Ingenieria del Software y Bases de Datos, JISBD

Conference

Conference16th Conference on Software Engineering and Databases, JISBD 2011
Abbreviated titleJISBD 2011
Country/TerritorySpain
CityLa Coruna
Period5/09/117/09/11

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Evaluation
  • Methodological framework
  • Software testing techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating software testing techniques and tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this