TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluations of training and education interventions for improved infectious disease management in low-income and middle-income countries
T2 - a systematic literature review
AU - Van Dorst, Pim Wilhelmus Maria
AU - Van Der Pol, Simon
AU - Salami, Olawale
AU - Dittrich, Sabine
AU - Olliaro, Piero
AU - Postma, Maarten
AU - Boersma, Cornelis
AU - Van Asselt, Antoinette Dorothea Isabelle
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This research is funded by the Foundation for Innovative new Diagnostics (FIND).
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.
PY - 2022/2/21
Y1 - 2022/2/21
N2 - Objectives To identify most vital input and outcome parameters required for evaluations of training and education interventions aimed at addressing infectious diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for eligible studies between January 2000 and November 2021. Study selection Health economic and health-outcome studies on infectious diseases covering an education or training intervention in low-income and middle-income countries were included. Results A total of 59 eligible studies covering training or education interventions for infectious diseases were found; infectious diseases were categorised as acute febrile infections (AFI), non-AFI and other non-acute infections. With regard to input parameters, the costs (direct and indirect) were most often reported. As outcome parameters, five categories were most often reported including final health outcomes, intermediate health outcomes, cost outcomes, prescription outcomes and health economic outcomes. Studies showed a wide range of per category variables included and a general lack of uniformity across studies. Conclusions Further standardisation is needed on the relevant input and outcome parameters in this field. A more standardised approach would improve generalisability and comparability of results and allow policy-makers to make better informed decisions on the most effective and cost-effective interventions.
AB - Objectives To identify most vital input and outcome parameters required for evaluations of training and education interventions aimed at addressing infectious diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for eligible studies between January 2000 and November 2021. Study selection Health economic and health-outcome studies on infectious diseases covering an education or training intervention in low-income and middle-income countries were included. Results A total of 59 eligible studies covering training or education interventions for infectious diseases were found; infectious diseases were categorised as acute febrile infections (AFI), non-AFI and other non-acute infections. With regard to input parameters, the costs (direct and indirect) were most often reported. As outcome parameters, five categories were most often reported including final health outcomes, intermediate health outcomes, cost outcomes, prescription outcomes and health economic outcomes. Studies showed a wide range of per category variables included and a general lack of uniformity across studies. Conclusions Further standardisation is needed on the relevant input and outcome parameters in this field. A more standardised approach would improve generalisability and comparability of results and allow policy-makers to make better informed decisions on the most effective and cost-effective interventions.
KW - health economics
KW - health policy
KW - infectious diseases
KW - medical education & training
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053832
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053832
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 35190429
AN - SCOPUS:85125155768
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 2
M1 - e053832
ER -