Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Explosive Violence in Context: A Comparison of Incidents Involving Explosives in the Netherlands and Sweden

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Following the recent rise of incidents involving explosives in the Netherlands and Sweden, this comparative study provides a qualitative, mainly descriptive analysis of the phenomenon of explosive attacks in both countries. Based on twenty-five interviews with
police professionals, the analysis identifies important similarities and differences between
the two countries. Perpetrators, motives, targets, and organizational methods are largely
comparable. In particular, the findings highlight the high willingness of youngsters and
the correspondingly large pool of potential executors for such attacks. The prime motive
is generally to convey a message, whereas the predominant targets were dwellings. The
findings further underscore the key role of social media and digital platforms in the recruitment, planning, communication, and coordination of attacks. Notable differences concern the underlying conflicts: in the Netherlands, attacks are driven by both criminal and
social conflicts; in Sweden, they are primarily linked to organized crime and local gangs.
Furthermore, in the Netherlands, it is predominantly professional fireworks that are used
as explosives, while a wider variety of explosive materials is employed in Sweden. This
comparative study contributes to the emerging literature by providing valuable insights
into explosive incidents and identifying avenues for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • Violence
  • Explosives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explosive Violence in Context: A Comparison of Incidents Involving Explosives in the Netherlands and Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this