Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, Styles, and Preferences

Frans Prins*, Dominique Sluijsmans, Paul A. Kirschner

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    20 Downloads (Pure)


    A General Practitioner (GP) is no longer a loner, but a team player in either a group practice or a care centre. This change has led to a concomitant growth in curricular interest in skills essential for successful collaboration and for enhancing critical reflection towards colleagues’ performance. Giving and receiving constructive feedback are examples of these skills. The aim of this study was to gain insight in the style and quality of feedback reports on consultation skills written by GPs-in-Training (GPiTs) and by their GP-trainers. Furthermore, the preferences of the GPiTs concerning feedback style were examined. Results show significant differences between GP-trainers and GPiTs in feedback style and quality. A ranking task indicated that GPiTs have a preference for reports characterized by a large number of reflective remarks. Questionnaire results indicate the added value of the use of peer feedback. Implications for the integration of peer feedback activities in the curriculum of GPiTs are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number289
    Pages (from-to)289-303
    Number of pages15
    JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006


    • consultation skills
    • feedback preferences
    • feedback quality
    • feedback style
    • peer feedback


    Dive into the research topics of 'Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, Styles, and Preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this