How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It

Academy of Management Proceedings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We report the findings of a study conducted among 172 European buyers in manufacturing regarding their relationship with their trading partners. Particularly, the focus is on whether and how asymmetry in the power position of two trading partners affects the level of inter-firm learning and the moderating role of inter-firm trust. Results indicate that power differentials have a negative impact on organizational learning when the level of trust is low. When inter-firm trust is high, power asymmetries have a slightly positive effect on inter-firm learning. Conclusions and implications are derived from the study. Findings and directions for further research are provided.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management Proceedings
EditorsGuclu Antic
PublisherAcademy of Management
Pages10655-10655
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014
Event2014 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - Pennsylvania Convention Center , Philadelphia, United States
Duration: 1 Aug 20145 Aug 2014
Conference number: 74
http://aom.org/EventDetail.aspx?id=2147483735

Publication series

NameProceedings
PublisherAcademy of Management
Volume2014
ISSN (Print)0065-0668
ISSN (Electronic)2151-6561

Conference

Conference2014 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
Abbreviated titleAOM2014
CountryUnited States
CityPhiladelphia
Period1/08/145/08/14
Internet address

Fingerprint

Inter-firm learning
Asymmetry
Buyers
Manufacturing
Organizational learning

Cite this

Caniels, M., & Ghijsen, P. (2014). How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It: Academy of Management Proceedings. In G. Antic (Ed.), Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 10655-10655). (Proceedings; Vol. 2014). Academy of Management.
Caniels, Marjolein ; Ghijsen, Paul. / How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It : Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management Proceedings. editor / Guclu Antic. Academy of Management, 2014. pp. 10655-10655 (Proceedings).
@inproceedings{3f7e9836b28344e49f6f54ccbfa4262a,
title = "How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It: Academy of Management Proceedings",
abstract = "We report the findings of a study conducted among 172 European buyers in manufacturing regarding their relationship with their trading partners. Particularly, the focus is on whether and how asymmetry in the power position of two trading partners affects the level of inter-firm learning and the moderating role of inter-firm trust. Results indicate that power differentials have a negative impact on organizational learning when the level of trust is low. When inter-firm trust is high, power asymmetries have a slightly positive effect on inter-firm learning. Conclusions and implications are derived from the study. Findings and directions for further research are provided.",
author = "Marjolein Caniels and Paul Ghijsen",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
series = "Proceedings",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
pages = "10655--10655",
editor = "Guclu Antic",
booktitle = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
address = "United States",

}

Caniels, M & Ghijsen, P 2014, How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It: Academy of Management Proceedings. in G Antic (ed.), Academy of Management Proceedings. Proceedings, vol. 2014, Academy of Management, pp. 10655-10655, 2014 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, United States, 1/08/14.

How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It : Academy of Management Proceedings. / Caniels, Marjolein; Ghijsen, Paul.

Academy of Management Proceedings. ed. / Guclu Antic. Academy of Management, 2014. p. 10655-10655 (Proceedings; Vol. 2014).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It

T2 - Academy of Management Proceedings

AU - Caniels, Marjolein

AU - Ghijsen, Paul

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - We report the findings of a study conducted among 172 European buyers in manufacturing regarding their relationship with their trading partners. Particularly, the focus is on whether and how asymmetry in the power position of two trading partners affects the level of inter-firm learning and the moderating role of inter-firm trust. Results indicate that power differentials have a negative impact on organizational learning when the level of trust is low. When inter-firm trust is high, power asymmetries have a slightly positive effect on inter-firm learning. Conclusions and implications are derived from the study. Findings and directions for further research are provided.

AB - We report the findings of a study conducted among 172 European buyers in manufacturing regarding their relationship with their trading partners. Particularly, the focus is on whether and how asymmetry in the power position of two trading partners affects the level of inter-firm learning and the moderating role of inter-firm trust. Results indicate that power differentials have a negative impact on organizational learning when the level of trust is low. When inter-firm trust is high, power asymmetries have a slightly positive effect on inter-firm learning. Conclusions and implications are derived from the study. Findings and directions for further research are provided.

UR - http://10.5465/ambpp.2014.10655abstract

M3 - Conference article in proceeding

T3 - Proceedings

SP - 10655

EP - 10655

BT - Academy of Management Proceedings

A2 - Antic, Guclu

PB - Academy of Management

ER -

Caniels M, Ghijsen P. How Power Differences Affect Interfirm Learning, and What To Do About It: Academy of Management Proceedings. In Antic G, editor, Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management. 2014. p. 10655-10655. (Proceedings).