How self-relevant is fair treatment? Social self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects

D. De Cremer, D. Van Knippenberg, M. Van Dijke, A.E.R. Bos

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    An organizational field study examined the extent to which fair treatment influences organizational commitment was a function of employees' levels of social self-esteem. Following recent research indicating that self-esteem acts as a moderator of procedural fairness effects, we suggested that to examine the relational assumption that self and procedures are related, one should assess the social dimension of self-esteem. In line with predictions, the results indeed showed that fair treatment (assessed by an interactional justice scale) positively influences affective commitment, but only when employees have low social self-esteem. These findings are discussed in light of research on relational models of justice and sociometer theory.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)407–419
    JournalSocial justice research
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How self-relevant is fair treatment? Social self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this