Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences

Elma Dijkstra, Amber Walraven, Ton Mooij, Paul A. Kirschner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article presents the findings from a teacher intervention in Dutch kindergartens aimed at improving teachers’ differentiation practices (DP) to better anticipate student differences. The intervention was designed to improve the match between student levels and curricularactivities, in particular for high-ability students and consists of threecomponents. A pretest–posttest cluster randomised design was usedwith three conditions: control (n = 34), pilot intervention (n = 32) andimproved intervention (n = 34). Quantitative results demonstratethat the intervention fidelity was relatively high in the improvedintervention. Correlations confirmed that teacher-reported DP werehigher in schools where the intervention was more completelyimplemented. DP were enhanced in both intervention conditions,but showed greater improvement in the improved intervention.Qualitative data revealed process characteristics that reflect problemsschools encounter with this intervention. Teachers can be supportedin improving DP, but this requires school-wide intensive and longsupport.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-377
JournalEducational Studies
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

kindergarten teacher
student
teacher
kindergarten
school

Keywords

  • Screening
  • instructional differentiation
  • curriculum differentiation
  • kindergarten teachers
  • school policy

Cite this

@article{262b82302f2441f4b73c4ca2cf25f852,
title = "Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences",
abstract = "This article presents the findings from a teacher intervention in Dutch kindergartens aimed at improving teachers’ differentiation practices (DP) to better anticipate student differences. The intervention was designed to improve the match between student levels and curricularactivities, in particular for high-ability students and consists of threecomponents. A pretest–posttest cluster randomised design was usedwith three conditions: control (n = 34), pilot intervention (n = 32) andimproved intervention (n = 34). Quantitative results demonstratethat the intervention fidelity was relatively high in the improvedintervention. Correlations confirmed that teacher-reported DP werehigher in schools where the intervention was more completelyimplemented. DP were enhanced in both intervention conditions,but showed greater improvement in the improved intervention.Qualitative data revealed process characteristics that reflect problemsschools encounter with this intervention. Teachers can be supportedin improving DP, but this requires school-wide intensive and longsupport.",
keywords = "Screening, instructional differentiation, curriculum differentiation, kindergarten teachers, school policy",
author = "Elma Dijkstra and Amber Walraven and Ton Mooij and Kirschner, {Paul A.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/03055698.2016.1195719",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "357--377",
journal = "Educational Studies",
issn = "0305-5698",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences. / Dijkstra, Elma; Walraven, Amber; Mooij, Ton; Kirschner, Paul A.

In: Educational Studies, Vol. 42, 2016, p. 357-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving kindergarten teachers’ differentiation practices to better anticipate student differences

AU - Dijkstra, Elma

AU - Walraven, Amber

AU - Mooij, Ton

AU - Kirschner, Paul A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article presents the findings from a teacher intervention in Dutch kindergartens aimed at improving teachers’ differentiation practices (DP) to better anticipate student differences. The intervention was designed to improve the match between student levels and curricularactivities, in particular for high-ability students and consists of threecomponents. A pretest–posttest cluster randomised design was usedwith three conditions: control (n = 34), pilot intervention (n = 32) andimproved intervention (n = 34). Quantitative results demonstratethat the intervention fidelity was relatively high in the improvedintervention. Correlations confirmed that teacher-reported DP werehigher in schools where the intervention was more completelyimplemented. DP were enhanced in both intervention conditions,but showed greater improvement in the improved intervention.Qualitative data revealed process characteristics that reflect problemsschools encounter with this intervention. Teachers can be supportedin improving DP, but this requires school-wide intensive and longsupport.

AB - This article presents the findings from a teacher intervention in Dutch kindergartens aimed at improving teachers’ differentiation practices (DP) to better anticipate student differences. The intervention was designed to improve the match between student levels and curricularactivities, in particular for high-ability students and consists of threecomponents. A pretest–posttest cluster randomised design was usedwith three conditions: control (n = 34), pilot intervention (n = 32) andimproved intervention (n = 34). Quantitative results demonstratethat the intervention fidelity was relatively high in the improvedintervention. Correlations confirmed that teacher-reported DP werehigher in schools where the intervention was more completelyimplemented. DP were enhanced in both intervention conditions,but showed greater improvement in the improved intervention.Qualitative data revealed process characteristics that reflect problemsschools encounter with this intervention. Teachers can be supportedin improving DP, but this requires school-wide intensive and longsupport.

KW - Screening

KW - instructional differentiation

KW - curriculum differentiation

KW - kindergarten teachers

KW - school policy

U2 - 10.1080/03055698.2016.1195719

DO - 10.1080/03055698.2016.1195719

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 357

EP - 377

JO - Educational Studies

JF - Educational Studies

SN - 0305-5698

ER -