Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts: how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised

J.R. Floor*, C. S. A. (Kris) van Koppen, Jan P. M. van Tatenhove

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Policy-makers and scientists often expect that controversies in public policy can be solved by gathering more knowledge, even though this linear model of expertise is widely criticised in social studies of science. To shed more light on this expectation, the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016) is investigated. The analysis shows that mussel fishery regulation decisions were primarily based on government authority, not on scientific knowledge. Expectations of policy-makers and scientists on conflict resolution by more research were not met, because the knowledge debate was politicised over ambiguous knowledge claims. The controversy was depoliticised by a political covenant between the conflicting parties. The case study confirms that science-based knowledge fails to guide policy-making as expected in the linear model, and demonstrates how science plays important strategic, procedural and instrumental roles in structuring interactions between stakeholders in nature protection conflicts.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalEnvironmental Politics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

fishery
uncertainty
linear model
science
fishery regulation
social studies
conflict resolution
policy making
knowledge
stakeholder
expertise
public policy
regulation
interaction
Wadden Sea
conflict
policy
decision
nature protection
analysis

Keywords

  • epoliticisation, knowledge expectations, knowledge uncertainties, science-policy interactions, mussel fishery, Wadden Sea

Cite this

@article{d9a64ea17f3f42a18b8dc8f1fbd26931,
title = "Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts: how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised",
abstract = "Policy-makers and scientists often expect that controversies in public policy can be solved by gathering more knowledge, even though this linear model of expertise is widely criticised in social studies of science. To shed more light on this expectation, the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016) is investigated. The analysis shows that mussel fishery regulation decisions were primarily based on government authority, not on scientific knowledge. Expectations of policy-makers and scientists on conflict resolution by more research were not met, because the knowledge debate was politicised over ambiguous knowledge claims. The controversy was depoliticised by a political covenant between the conflicting parties. The case study confirms that science-based knowledge fails to guide policy-making as expected in the linear model, and demonstrates how science plays important strategic, procedural and instrumental roles in structuring interactions between stakeholders in nature protection conflicts.",
keywords = "epoliticisation, knowledge expectations, knowledge uncertainties, science-policy interactions, mussel fishery, Wadden Sea",
author = "J.R. Floor and {van Koppen}, {C. S. A. (Kris)} and {van Tatenhove}, {Jan P. M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2018.1546561",
language = "English",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",

}

Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts : how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised. / Floor, J.R.; van Koppen, C. S. A. (Kris); van Tatenhove, Jan P. M.

In: Environmental Politics, 20.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge uncertainties in environmental conflicts

T2 - how the mussel fishery controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea became depoliticised

AU - Floor, J.R.

AU - van Koppen, C. S. A. (Kris)

AU - van Tatenhove, Jan P. M.

PY - 2018/11/20

Y1 - 2018/11/20

N2 - Policy-makers and scientists often expect that controversies in public policy can be solved by gathering more knowledge, even though this linear model of expertise is widely criticised in social studies of science. To shed more light on this expectation, the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016) is investigated. The analysis shows that mussel fishery regulation decisions were primarily based on government authority, not on scientific knowledge. Expectations of policy-makers and scientists on conflict resolution by more research were not met, because the knowledge debate was politicised over ambiguous knowledge claims. The controversy was depoliticised by a political covenant between the conflicting parties. The case study confirms that science-based knowledge fails to guide policy-making as expected in the linear model, and demonstrates how science plays important strategic, procedural and instrumental roles in structuring interactions between stakeholders in nature protection conflicts.

AB - Policy-makers and scientists often expect that controversies in public policy can be solved by gathering more knowledge, even though this linear model of expertise is widely criticised in social studies of science. To shed more light on this expectation, the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016) is investigated. The analysis shows that mussel fishery regulation decisions were primarily based on government authority, not on scientific knowledge. Expectations of policy-makers and scientists on conflict resolution by more research were not met, because the knowledge debate was politicised over ambiguous knowledge claims. The controversy was depoliticised by a political covenant between the conflicting parties. The case study confirms that science-based knowledge fails to guide policy-making as expected in the linear model, and demonstrates how science plays important strategic, procedural and instrumental roles in structuring interactions between stakeholders in nature protection conflicts.

KW - epoliticisation, knowledge expectations, knowledge uncertainties, science-policy interactions, mussel fishery, Wadden Sea

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1546561

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1546561

M3 - Article

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

ER -