TY - CONF
T1 - Lifelong Competence Development: On the Advantages of Formal Competence-Performance Modeling
AU - Kickmeier-Rust, Michael D.
AU - Albert, Dietrich
AU - Steiner, Christina
N1 - DS_Description: Please, cite this publication as: Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D., & Steiner, C. (2006). Lifelong Competence Development: On the Advantages of Formal Competence-Performance Modeling. Proceedings of International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, TENCompetence Conference. March 30th-31st, Sofia, Bulgaria: TENCompetence. Retrieved June 30th, 2006, from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org
DS_Sponsorship:The work on this chapter has been sponsored by the TENCompetence Integrated Project that is funded by the European Commission's 6th Framework Programme, priority IST/Technology Enhanced Learning. Contract 027087 (_www.tencompetence.org <http://www.tencompetence.org/>_)
PY - 2006/6/30
Y1 - 2006/6/30
N2 - Efficient support, in-depth modeling, and tracking of the development of individual competence is, undoubtedly,
a major challenge for interdisciplinary research and development. From our viewpoint, a major problem is the
often unclear and sometimes vague approach to competence. Often it is assumed that competence can directly be
assessed. Many definitions of competence, however, agree that competence is an abstract, latent quality, which
cannot directly be observed. Thus, it is highly difficult to keep track on competence development over time or to
compare competencies assessed with different instruments (such as tests, observations, or certain achievements).
This article discusses the advantages of a formal competence-performance modeling such as a clear definition of
latent competencies and a separation from observable performance (e.g., test results). Other advantages
discussed are the possibility of exactly determining a person’s competence state, incorporating interdependencies
between competencies, and modeling individual learning paths over time.
AB - Efficient support, in-depth modeling, and tracking of the development of individual competence is, undoubtedly,
a major challenge for interdisciplinary research and development. From our viewpoint, a major problem is the
often unclear and sometimes vague approach to competence. Often it is assumed that competence can directly be
assessed. Many definitions of competence, however, agree that competence is an abstract, latent quality, which
cannot directly be observed. Thus, it is highly difficult to keep track on competence development over time or to
compare competencies assessed with different instruments (such as tests, observations, or certain achievements).
This article discusses the advantages of a formal competence-performance modeling such as a clear definition of
latent competencies and a separation from observable performance (e.g., test results). Other advantages
discussed are the possibility of exactly determining a person’s competence state, incorporating interdependencies
between competencies, and modeling individual learning paths over time.
KW - Competence
KW - Performance
KW - Lifelong learning
UR - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.210.3139&rep=rep1&type=pdf
UR - https://www.academia.edu/2749402/Learning_networks_for_lifelong_competence_development
M3 - Paper
T2 - TENCompetence Conference
Y2 - 30 March 2006 through 31 March 2006
ER -