TY - JOUR
T1 - Living the Viva
T2 - the oral examination in practice
AU - McNeill, Jeff
AU - Benitez-Capistros, Francisco
AU - Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid
AU - Deboelpaep, Evelien
AU - Hugé, Jean
AU - Mukherjee, Nibedita
AU - Van der stocken, Tom
AU - Van Puyvelde, Karolien
AU - Koedam, Nico
PY - 2024/11/15
Y1 - 2024/11/15
N2 - The viva examination or ‘defence’ is a pivotal moment in a student’s or researcher’s career. It marks the conclusion of one stage and the beginning of another, whether during the study period or when competing for research funding. Unlike many other formal assessments, the viva is an oral performance. Its form may strongly depend on the domain of science or knowledge sector, on the university or even on faculty. The rituals of interaction between jurors and candidates may differ in many cultural contexts. Yet, the core elements of the defence are the debate, the use of evidence, and the justification for a statement or opinion delivered orally, are common to all. Accordingly, although a successful defence is about content, it is also about language and attitude. In academic education, there is insufficient preparation for this moment when one is in front of jurors, a commission, and even a wider audience. We draw on our combined experience in our own careers and in their coaching of students to present an analysis of the ‘viva’ process. Our findings may help candidates position themselves in the viva context and offer practical advice on how to prepare, define an attitude, and structure answers and responses in general.
AB - The viva examination or ‘defence’ is a pivotal moment in a student’s or researcher’s career. It marks the conclusion of one stage and the beginning of another, whether during the study period or when competing for research funding. Unlike many other formal assessments, the viva is an oral performance. Its form may strongly depend on the domain of science or knowledge sector, on the university or even on faculty. The rituals of interaction between jurors and candidates may differ in many cultural contexts. Yet, the core elements of the defence are the debate, the use of evidence, and the justification for a statement or opinion delivered orally, are common to all. Accordingly, although a successful defence is about content, it is also about language and attitude. In academic education, there is insufficient preparation for this moment when one is in front of jurors, a commission, and even a wider audience. We draw on our combined experience in our own careers and in their coaching of students to present an analysis of the ‘viva’ process. Our findings may help candidates position themselves in the viva context and offer practical advice on how to prepare, define an attitude, and structure answers and responses in general.
KW - examination
KW - public defense
KW - jury
KW - thesis
KW - scientific argument
U2 - 10.12973/ijem.10.4.629
DO - 10.12973/ijem.10.4.629
M3 - Article
SN - 2469-9632
VL - 10
SP - 630
EP - 643
JO - International Journal of Educational Methodology
JF - International Journal of Educational Methodology
IS - 4
ER -