Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model

Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity

Petru Lucian Curseu*, Thijs ten Brink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Traditionally, minority influence literature has conceptualized minority dissent (MD) as a driver of divergent thinking (DT) at the individual and group level of analysis. In this paper we argue that DT and MD have a more complex interdependence and DT could in fact be conceptualized as a prerequisite of MD. In an experimental study carried out in two cultural contexts (The Netherlands and China), we tested the effect of an intervention aimed at emphasizing the value of DT on the MD related mental model change, on willingness to engage in MD and ultimately on group creativity. Our results show that members of groups that received the DT manipulation had less negative evaluations of MD compared to members in groups that did not receive the DT manipulation. However, DT triggered group members to engage in MD only in individualistic groups and not collectivistic ones and ultimately led to less creative performance in groups that operated in a collectivistic cultural context. Our study also contributes to the extrapolation of cultural differences in creative performance from individual to the group level of analysis and shows that groups operating in collectivistic cultures have a lower creativity in a divergent thinking task as compared to groups operating in an individualistic culture. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-96
Number of pages11
JournalThinking Skills and Creativity
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Minority dissent
  • Group creativity
  • Cross-cultural research
  • DECISION-MAKING
  • INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM
  • MULTIPLE-ITEM
  • SINGLE-ITEM
  • BEHAVIOR
  • INFORMATION
  • DEVIANCE
  • MAJORITY
  • TEAMS
  • PERFORMANCE

Cite this

@article{fc3cf7769dc140218b64e4adeb545671,
title = "Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model: Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity",
abstract = "Traditionally, minority influence literature has conceptualized minority dissent (MD) as a driver of divergent thinking (DT) at the individual and group level of analysis. In this paper we argue that DT and MD have a more complex interdependence and DT could in fact be conceptualized as a prerequisite of MD. In an experimental study carried out in two cultural contexts (The Netherlands and China), we tested the effect of an intervention aimed at emphasizing the value of DT on the MD related mental model change, on willingness to engage in MD and ultimately on group creativity. Our results show that members of groups that received the DT manipulation had less negative evaluations of MD compared to members in groups that did not receive the DT manipulation. However, DT triggered group members to engage in MD only in individualistic groups and not collectivistic ones and ultimately led to less creative performance in groups that operated in a collectivistic cultural context. Our study also contributes to the extrapolation of cultural differences in creative performance from individual to the group level of analysis and shows that groups operating in collectivistic cultures have a lower creativity in a divergent thinking task as compared to groups operating in an individualistic culture. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Minority dissent, Group creativity, Cross-cultural research, DECISION-MAKING, INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM, MULTIPLE-ITEM, SINGLE-ITEM, BEHAVIOR, INFORMATION, DEVIANCE, MAJORITY, TEAMS, PERFORMANCE",
author = "Curseu, {Petru Lucian} and {ten Brink}, Thijs",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "86--96",
journal = "Thinking Skills and Creativity",
issn = "1871-1871",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model : Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity. / Curseu, Petru Lucian; ten Brink, Thijs.

In: Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 22, 2016, p. 86-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model

T2 - Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity

AU - Curseu, Petru Lucian

AU - ten Brink, Thijs

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Traditionally, minority influence literature has conceptualized minority dissent (MD) as a driver of divergent thinking (DT) at the individual and group level of analysis. In this paper we argue that DT and MD have a more complex interdependence and DT could in fact be conceptualized as a prerequisite of MD. In an experimental study carried out in two cultural contexts (The Netherlands and China), we tested the effect of an intervention aimed at emphasizing the value of DT on the MD related mental model change, on willingness to engage in MD and ultimately on group creativity. Our results show that members of groups that received the DT manipulation had less negative evaluations of MD compared to members in groups that did not receive the DT manipulation. However, DT triggered group members to engage in MD only in individualistic groups and not collectivistic ones and ultimately led to less creative performance in groups that operated in a collectivistic cultural context. Our study also contributes to the extrapolation of cultural differences in creative performance from individual to the group level of analysis and shows that groups operating in collectivistic cultures have a lower creativity in a divergent thinking task as compared to groups operating in an individualistic culture. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Traditionally, minority influence literature has conceptualized minority dissent (MD) as a driver of divergent thinking (DT) at the individual and group level of analysis. In this paper we argue that DT and MD have a more complex interdependence and DT could in fact be conceptualized as a prerequisite of MD. In an experimental study carried out in two cultural contexts (The Netherlands and China), we tested the effect of an intervention aimed at emphasizing the value of DT on the MD related mental model change, on willingness to engage in MD and ultimately on group creativity. Our results show that members of groups that received the DT manipulation had less negative evaluations of MD compared to members in groups that did not receive the DT manipulation. However, DT triggered group members to engage in MD only in individualistic groups and not collectivistic ones and ultimately led to less creative performance in groups that operated in a collectivistic cultural context. Our study also contributes to the extrapolation of cultural differences in creative performance from individual to the group level of analysis and shows that groups operating in collectivistic cultures have a lower creativity in a divergent thinking task as compared to groups operating in an individualistic culture. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Minority dissent

KW - Group creativity

KW - Cross-cultural research

KW - DECISION-MAKING

KW - INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM

KW - MULTIPLE-ITEM

KW - SINGLE-ITEM

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - INFORMATION

KW - DEVIANCE

KW - MAJORITY

KW - TEAMS

KW - PERFORMANCE

U2 - 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 86

EP - 96

JO - Thinking Skills and Creativity

JF - Thinking Skills and Creativity

SN - 1871-1871

ER -