Moving up the ladder: heterogeneity influencing academic careers through research orientation, gender, and mentors

W.M. Ooms, Claudia Werker, Christian Hopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We look into the question whether heterogeneity stemming from research orientation, gender, or disciplinary and cultural differences with their PhD supervisors helps or hampers academics’ careers. Based on a sample of 248 academics at two leading European universities of technology, we combine multinomial logit models and sequential logit models to understand career advancement. Our results show that heterogeneity stemming from research orientation is helpful. Academics who bridge between the quest for fundamental understanding and socio-economic relevance attain career success. Yet heterogeneity stemming from gender hinders careers: female academics face problems securing tenured positions and full professorships. Mentor–mentee heterogeneity only helps in early career transitions, but hampers advancement later on. Our insights offer suggestions to policymakers, university managers, and academics, because they help to identify promising academics, the right support for sitting staff members, measures correcting for gender imbalances, and can inform strategic choices regarding research orientation and PhD supervisors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1268-1289
Number of pages22
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume44
Issue number7
Early online date16 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

academic career
gender
career
academic (female)
career advancement
university
cultural difference
manager
staff
economics

Keywords

  • academic careers
  • mentoring
  • heterogeneity
  • research orientation
  • gender
  • PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY
  • SCIENTISTS
  • INDUSTRY
  • INNOVATION
  • MODEL
  • Academic careers
  • WOMEN
  • EXPERIENCE
  • SCIENCE
  • UNIVERSITIES
  • KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

Cite this

@article{ad16d4bf043041c0a2444b1f0085469a,
title = "Moving up the ladder: heterogeneity influencing academic careers through research orientation, gender, and mentors",
abstract = "We look into the question whether heterogeneity stemming from research orientation, gender, or disciplinary and cultural differences with their PhD supervisors helps or hampers academics’ careers. Based on a sample of 248 academics at two leading European universities of technology, we combine multinomial logit models and sequential logit models to understand career advancement. Our results show that heterogeneity stemming from research orientation is helpful. Academics who bridge between the quest for fundamental understanding and socio-economic relevance attain career success. Yet heterogeneity stemming from gender hinders careers: female academics face problems securing tenured positions and full professorships. Mentor–mentee heterogeneity only helps in early career transitions, but hampers advancement later on. Our insights offer suggestions to policymakers, university managers, and academics, because they help to identify promising academics, the right support for sitting staff members, measures correcting for gender imbalances, and can inform strategic choices regarding research orientation and PhD supervisors.",
keywords = "academic careers, mentoring, heterogeneity, research orientation, gender, PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY, SCIENTISTS, INDUSTRY, INNOVATION, MODEL, Academic careers, WOMEN, EXPERIENCE, SCIENCE, UNIVERSITIES, KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER",
author = "W.M. Ooms and Claudia Werker and Christian Hopp",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2018.1434617",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1268--1289",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "7",

}

Moving up the ladder: heterogeneity influencing academic careers through research orientation, gender, and mentors. / Ooms, W.M.; Werker, Claudia; Hopp, Christian.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 44, No. 7, 03.07.2019, p. 1268-1289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving up the ladder: heterogeneity influencing academic careers through research orientation, gender, and mentors

AU - Ooms, W.M.

AU - Werker, Claudia

AU - Hopp, Christian

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - We look into the question whether heterogeneity stemming from research orientation, gender, or disciplinary and cultural differences with their PhD supervisors helps or hampers academics’ careers. Based on a sample of 248 academics at two leading European universities of technology, we combine multinomial logit models and sequential logit models to understand career advancement. Our results show that heterogeneity stemming from research orientation is helpful. Academics who bridge between the quest for fundamental understanding and socio-economic relevance attain career success. Yet heterogeneity stemming from gender hinders careers: female academics face problems securing tenured positions and full professorships. Mentor–mentee heterogeneity only helps in early career transitions, but hampers advancement later on. Our insights offer suggestions to policymakers, university managers, and academics, because they help to identify promising academics, the right support for sitting staff members, measures correcting for gender imbalances, and can inform strategic choices regarding research orientation and PhD supervisors.

AB - We look into the question whether heterogeneity stemming from research orientation, gender, or disciplinary and cultural differences with their PhD supervisors helps or hampers academics’ careers. Based on a sample of 248 academics at two leading European universities of technology, we combine multinomial logit models and sequential logit models to understand career advancement. Our results show that heterogeneity stemming from research orientation is helpful. Academics who bridge between the quest for fundamental understanding and socio-economic relevance attain career success. Yet heterogeneity stemming from gender hinders careers: female academics face problems securing tenured positions and full professorships. Mentor–mentee heterogeneity only helps in early career transitions, but hampers advancement later on. Our insights offer suggestions to policymakers, university managers, and academics, because they help to identify promising academics, the right support for sitting staff members, measures correcting for gender imbalances, and can inform strategic choices regarding research orientation and PhD supervisors.

KW - academic careers

KW - mentoring

KW - heterogeneity

KW - research orientation

KW - gender

KW - PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY

KW - SCIENTISTS

KW - INDUSTRY

KW - INNOVATION

KW - MODEL

KW - Academic careers

KW - WOMEN

KW - EXPERIENCE

KW - SCIENCE

KW - UNIVERSITIES

KW - KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1434617

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1434617

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1268

EP - 1289

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 7

ER -