Natuurbeheer, ecologie en onzekerheid: Een analyse van het mosselvisserijconflict in de Waddenzee

Translated title of the contribution: Nature protection, ecology, and uncertainty: An analysis of the mussel fishery conflict in the Wadden Sea

J.R. Floor, C. S. A. (Kris) van Koppen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Parties involved in conflicts on nature protection, including ecologists and policy officials, often expect that the controversies arising in these conflicts can be resolved by doing more research, in order to take away existing uncertainties in knowledge. Typically, these uncertainties are interpreted as incomplete knowledge. To shed more light on this expectation, which in literature is known as the 'linear' approach to knowledge in policy, this article investigates the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch
Wadden Sea (1990–2016). Findings show that while a substantial amount of research was done, it was not science-based knowledge that guided policy-making. Instead the controversy was closed, at least temporarily, by the Mussel Covenant, a political agreement between the fishery and nature protection parties. Many of the knowledge uncertainties in this case could be characterized as ambiguous knowledge, stemming from diverging interpretations of research findings, rather than incomplete knowledge. We conclude that science is an important factor in conflicts, but societal and political debates remain crucial in bringing complex nature protection conflicts to closure.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)157-165
Number of pages9
JournalLandschap
Volume36
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

uncertainty analysis
fishery
ecology
policy making
nature protection
Wadden Sea
conflict
policy
science

Keywords

  • knowledge uncertainties, nature protection conflicts, Wadden Sea, mussel fishery, Natura 2000

Cite this

@article{a24e0498f1b24fafa800eab7378588df,
title = "Natuurbeheer, ecologie en onzekerheid: Een analyse van het mosselvisserijconflict in de Waddenzee",
abstract = "Parties involved in conflicts on nature protection, including ecologists and policy officials, often expect that the controversies arising in these conflicts can be resolved by doing more research, in order to take away existing uncertainties in knowledge. Typically, these uncertainties are interpreted as incomplete knowledge. To shed more light on this expectation, which in literature is known as the 'linear' approach to knowledge in policy, this article investigates the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016). Findings show that while a substantial amount of research was done, it was not science-based knowledge that guided policy-making. Instead the controversy was closed, at least temporarily, by the Mussel Covenant, a political agreement between the fishery and nature protection parties. Many of the knowledge uncertainties in this case could be characterized as ambiguous knowledge, stemming from diverging interpretations of research findings, rather than incomplete knowledge. We conclude that science is an important factor in conflicts, but societal and political debates remain crucial in bringing complex nature protection conflicts to closure.",
keywords = "knowledge uncertainties, nature protection conflicts, Wadden Sea, mussel fishery, Natura 2000",
author = "J.R. Floor and {van Koppen}, {C. S. A. (Kris)}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "36",
pages = "157--165",
journal = "Landschap",
issn = "0169-6300",
publisher = "Werkgemeenschap Landschapsecologisch Onderzoek",
number = "3",

}

Natuurbeheer, ecologie en onzekerheid : Een analyse van het mosselvisserijconflict in de Waddenzee. / Floor, J.R.; van Koppen, C. S. A. (Kris).

In: Landschap, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.11.2019, p. 157-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natuurbeheer, ecologie en onzekerheid

T2 - Een analyse van het mosselvisserijconflict in de Waddenzee

AU - Floor, J.R.

AU - van Koppen, C. S. A. (Kris)

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Parties involved in conflicts on nature protection, including ecologists and policy officials, often expect that the controversies arising in these conflicts can be resolved by doing more research, in order to take away existing uncertainties in knowledge. Typically, these uncertainties are interpreted as incomplete knowledge. To shed more light on this expectation, which in literature is known as the 'linear' approach to knowledge in policy, this article investigates the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016). Findings show that while a substantial amount of research was done, it was not science-based knowledge that guided policy-making. Instead the controversy was closed, at least temporarily, by the Mussel Covenant, a political agreement between the fishery and nature protection parties. Many of the knowledge uncertainties in this case could be characterized as ambiguous knowledge, stemming from diverging interpretations of research findings, rather than incomplete knowledge. We conclude that science is an important factor in conflicts, but societal and political debates remain crucial in bringing complex nature protection conflicts to closure.

AB - Parties involved in conflicts on nature protection, including ecologists and policy officials, often expect that the controversies arising in these conflicts can be resolved by doing more research, in order to take away existing uncertainties in knowledge. Typically, these uncertainties are interpreted as incomplete knowledge. To shed more light on this expectation, which in literature is known as the 'linear' approach to knowledge in policy, this article investigates the role of scientific uncertainties in controversies on mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea (1990–2016). Findings show that while a substantial amount of research was done, it was not science-based knowledge that guided policy-making. Instead the controversy was closed, at least temporarily, by the Mussel Covenant, a political agreement between the fishery and nature protection parties. Many of the knowledge uncertainties in this case could be characterized as ambiguous knowledge, stemming from diverging interpretations of research findings, rather than incomplete knowledge. We conclude that science is an important factor in conflicts, but societal and political debates remain crucial in bringing complex nature protection conflicts to closure.

KW - knowledge uncertainties, nature protection conflicts, Wadden Sea, mussel fishery, Natura 2000

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 157

EP - 165

JO - Landschap

JF - Landschap

SN - 0169-6300

IS - 3

ER -