On the Different Meanings of 'Judicial Dialogue' [Review of: M. Bobek (2013) Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts]

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	175-181
Number of pages	7
Journal	European Constitutional Law Review
Volume	10
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019614001114
Publication status	Published - 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

@article{e91acb7b3e734fbf952d3618fd21f70b,

title = "On the Different Meanings of 'Judicial Dialogue' [Review of: M. Bobek (2013) Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts]",

author = "C. Zoethout",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1017/S1574019614001114",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "175--181",

journal = "European Constitutional Law Review",

issn = "1574-0196",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Different Meanings of 'Judicial Dialogue' [Review of: M. Bobek (2013) Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts]

AU - Zoethout, C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1017/S1574019614001114

DO - 10.1017/S1574019614001114

M3 - Article

SN - 1574-0196

VL - 10

SP - 175

EP - 181

JO - European Constitutional Law Review

JF - European Constitutional Law Review

IS - 1

ER -