Participatory social capacity building

Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands

Douwe L. de Voogt*, Saskia Bisschops, Stefania Munaretto

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Social capacity building is increasingly suggested as strategy for supporting vulnerable communities in dealing with natural hazards such as floods. However, research on the empirical implementation of social capacity building is still limited. This paper presents a conceptualisation and an empirical case study of participatory social capacity building for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. We designed and implemented two distinct participatory pilots, studied the processes and outcomes to assess what factors influence social capacity building, and assessed how existing capacity may be leveraged. Social capacity is herein conceptualised as consisting of five dimensions: Knowledge, Motivation, Networks, Finance, and Participation. The first pilot included a walk in flood-prone areas and a discussion session with citizens and flood risk authority representatives. The second pilot involved elementary school pupils interviewing senior citizens with flood experience. Based on qualitative observation and analysis of the processes, findings suggest there is good potential for mutual sharing of knowledge if all participating actors are equal in the participatory process, and that informal settings open up debates, but also that leveraging existing social capacities might inadvertently impede the dissemination of knowledge that is vital in coping with (future) disaster risks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-96
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Fingerprint

capacity building
natural disaster
Netherlands
mitigation
experience
elementary school pupil
natural hazard
citizen
finance
disaster
coping
participation
community

Keywords

  • Public participation
  • Governance
  • Disaster risk management
  • EU Flood Directive
  • Natural hazards
  • Vulnerability
  • GOVERNANCE
  • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
  • RESILIENCE
  • PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION
  • FRAMEWORK
  • STAKEHOLDER
  • ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT

Cite this

@article{12ffca7772814559878aba9cfaa925b1,
title = "Participatory social capacity building: Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Social capacity building is increasingly suggested as strategy for supporting vulnerable communities in dealing with natural hazards such as floods. However, research on the empirical implementation of social capacity building is still limited. This paper presents a conceptualisation and an empirical case study of participatory social capacity building for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. We designed and implemented two distinct participatory pilots, studied the processes and outcomes to assess what factors influence social capacity building, and assessed how existing capacity may be leveraged. Social capacity is herein conceptualised as consisting of five dimensions: Knowledge, Motivation, Networks, Finance, and Participation. The first pilot included a walk in flood-prone areas and a discussion session with citizens and flood risk authority representatives. The second pilot involved elementary school pupils interviewing senior citizens with flood experience. Based on qualitative observation and analysis of the processes, findings suggest there is good potential for mutual sharing of knowledge if all participating actors are equal in the participatory process, and that informal settings open up debates, but also that leveraging existing social capacities might inadvertently impede the dissemination of knowledge that is vital in coping with (future) disaster risks.",
keywords = "Public participation, Governance, Disaster risk management, EU Flood Directive, Natural hazards, Vulnerability, GOVERNANCE, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION, RESILIENCE, PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION, FRAMEWORK, STAKEHOLDER, ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT",
author = "{de Voogt}, {Douwe L.} and Saskia Bisschops and Stefania Munaretto",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "89--96",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Participatory social capacity building : Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. / de Voogt, Douwe L.; Bisschops, Saskia; Munaretto, Stefania.

In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 99, 09.2019, p. 89-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory social capacity building

T2 - Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands

AU - de Voogt, Douwe L.

AU - Bisschops, Saskia

AU - Munaretto, Stefania

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Social capacity building is increasingly suggested as strategy for supporting vulnerable communities in dealing with natural hazards such as floods. However, research on the empirical implementation of social capacity building is still limited. This paper presents a conceptualisation and an empirical case study of participatory social capacity building for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. We designed and implemented two distinct participatory pilots, studied the processes and outcomes to assess what factors influence social capacity building, and assessed how existing capacity may be leveraged. Social capacity is herein conceptualised as consisting of five dimensions: Knowledge, Motivation, Networks, Finance, and Participation. The first pilot included a walk in flood-prone areas and a discussion session with citizens and flood risk authority representatives. The second pilot involved elementary school pupils interviewing senior citizens with flood experience. Based on qualitative observation and analysis of the processes, findings suggest there is good potential for mutual sharing of knowledge if all participating actors are equal in the participatory process, and that informal settings open up debates, but also that leveraging existing social capacities might inadvertently impede the dissemination of knowledge that is vital in coping with (future) disaster risks.

AB - Social capacity building is increasingly suggested as strategy for supporting vulnerable communities in dealing with natural hazards such as floods. However, research on the empirical implementation of social capacity building is still limited. This paper presents a conceptualisation and an empirical case study of participatory social capacity building for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. We designed and implemented two distinct participatory pilots, studied the processes and outcomes to assess what factors influence social capacity building, and assessed how existing capacity may be leveraged. Social capacity is herein conceptualised as consisting of five dimensions: Knowledge, Motivation, Networks, Finance, and Participation. The first pilot included a walk in flood-prone areas and a discussion session with citizens and flood risk authority representatives. The second pilot involved elementary school pupils interviewing senior citizens with flood experience. Based on qualitative observation and analysis of the processes, findings suggest there is good potential for mutual sharing of knowledge if all participating actors are equal in the participatory process, and that informal settings open up debates, but also that leveraging existing social capacities might inadvertently impede the dissemination of knowledge that is vital in coping with (future) disaster risks.

KW - Public participation

KW - Governance

KW - Disaster risk management

KW - EU Flood Directive

KW - Natural hazards

KW - Vulnerability

KW - GOVERNANCE

KW - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION

KW - RESILIENCE

KW - PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION

KW - FRAMEWORK

KW - STAKEHOLDER

KW - ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.019

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 89

EP - 96

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -