TY - JOUR
T1 - Polluting tanneries and small farmers in Kanpur, India
T2 - a theoretical analysis
AU - Batabyal, Amitrajeet A.
AU - Kourtit, Karima
AU - Nijkamp, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Batabyal acknowledges financial support from the Gosnell endowment at RIT.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We focus on the interaction between a representative polluting tannery and a negatively impacted small farmer in Kanpur, India. The tannery produces leather and toxic chemical waste that ends up in wastewater used by the small farmer to irrigate agricultural land and grow vegetables. The waste generated by the tannery is functionally related to its output of leather. The small farmer faces a capacity constraint that describes the maximum amount of vegetables he can grow. In this setting, we perform three tasks. First, we determine the optimal production of leather when the tannery does not account for the negative effect it has on the small farmer. Second, on the assumption that the tannery compensates the small farmer per unit of waste it generates, we ascertain the optimal compensation amount, the optimal output of leather, and the profit levels of the tannery and the small farmer. Finally, we compare the solutions in the preceding two cases and explain what accounts for the differences between them.
AB - We focus on the interaction between a representative polluting tannery and a negatively impacted small farmer in Kanpur, India. The tannery produces leather and toxic chemical waste that ends up in wastewater used by the small farmer to irrigate agricultural land and grow vegetables. The waste generated by the tannery is functionally related to its output of leather. The small farmer faces a capacity constraint that describes the maximum amount of vegetables he can grow. In this setting, we perform three tasks. First, we determine the optimal production of leather when the tannery does not account for the negative effect it has on the small farmer. Second, on the assumption that the tannery compensates the small farmer per unit of waste it generates, we ascertain the optimal compensation amount, the optimal output of leather, and the profit levels of the tannery and the small farmer. Finally, we compare the solutions in the preceding two cases and explain what accounts for the differences between them.
KW - Chemical waste
KW - Irrigation
KW - Leather
KW - Small farmer
KW - Tannery
U2 - 10.1007/s10666-022-09865-y
DO - 10.1007/s10666-022-09865-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141367809
SN - 1420-2026
VL - 28
SP - 331
EP - 336
JO - Environmental Modeling and Assessment
JF - Environmental Modeling and Assessment
IS - 2
ER -