Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory

a cluster analysis approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to promote physical activity uptake and maintenance in individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines, it is important to increase our understanding of physical activity motivation among this group. The present study aimed to examine motivational profiles in a large sample of adults who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.

METHODS: The sample for this study consisted of 2473 individuals (31.4% male; age 44.6 ± 12.9). In order to generate motivational profiles based on motivational regulation, a cluster analysis was conducted. One-way analyses of variance were then used to compare the clusters in terms of demographics, physical activity level, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active.

RESULTS: Three motivational clusters were derived based on motivational regulation scores: a low motivation cluster, a controlled motivation cluster and an autonomous motivation cluster. These clusters differed significantly from each other with respect to physical activity behavior, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active. Overall, the autonomous motivation cluster displayed more favorable characteristics compared to the other two clusters.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide additional support for the importance of autonomous motivation in the context of physical activity behavior. The three derived clusters may be relevant in the context of physical activity interventions as individuals within the different clusters might benefit most from different intervention approaches. In addition, this study shows that cluster analysis is a useful method for differentiating between motivational profiles in large groups of individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1
JournalBMC Psychology
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Personal Autonomy
Cluster Analysis
Motivation
Guidelines
Analysis of Variance
Maintenance
Demography

Cite this

@article{ae9167eab1a842c1a3442ef3b94d86f5,
title = "Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory: a cluster analysis approach",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In order to promote physical activity uptake and maintenance in individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines, it is important to increase our understanding of physical activity motivation among this group. The present study aimed to examine motivational profiles in a large sample of adults who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.METHODS: The sample for this study consisted of 2473 individuals (31.4{\%} male; age 44.6 ± 12.9). In order to generate motivational profiles based on motivational regulation, a cluster analysis was conducted. One-way analyses of variance were then used to compare the clusters in terms of demographics, physical activity level, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active.RESULTS: Three motivational clusters were derived based on motivational regulation scores: a low motivation cluster, a controlled motivation cluster and an autonomous motivation cluster. These clusters differed significantly from each other with respect to physical activity behavior, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active. Overall, the autonomous motivation cluster displayed more favorable characteristics compared to the other two clusters.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide additional support for the importance of autonomous motivation in the context of physical activity behavior. The three derived clusters may be relevant in the context of physical activity interventions as individuals within the different clusters might benefit most from different intervention approaches. In addition, this study shows that cluster analysis is a useful method for differentiating between motivational profiles in large groups of individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.",
author = "Friederichs, {Stijn Ah} and Catherine Bolman and Anke Oenema and Lilian Lechner",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1186/s40359-015-0059-2",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1",
journal = "BMC Psychology",
issn = "2050-7283",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory : a cluster analysis approach. / Friederichs, Stijn Ah; Bolman, Catherine; Oenema, Anke; Lechner, Lilian.

In: BMC Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, p. 1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory

T2 - a cluster analysis approach

AU - Friederichs, Stijn Ah

AU - Bolman, Catherine

AU - Oenema, Anke

AU - Lechner, Lilian

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: In order to promote physical activity uptake and maintenance in individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines, it is important to increase our understanding of physical activity motivation among this group. The present study aimed to examine motivational profiles in a large sample of adults who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.METHODS: The sample for this study consisted of 2473 individuals (31.4% male; age 44.6 ± 12.9). In order to generate motivational profiles based on motivational regulation, a cluster analysis was conducted. One-way analyses of variance were then used to compare the clusters in terms of demographics, physical activity level, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active.RESULTS: Three motivational clusters were derived based on motivational regulation scores: a low motivation cluster, a controlled motivation cluster and an autonomous motivation cluster. These clusters differed significantly from each other with respect to physical activity behavior, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active. Overall, the autonomous motivation cluster displayed more favorable characteristics compared to the other two clusters.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide additional support for the importance of autonomous motivation in the context of physical activity behavior. The three derived clusters may be relevant in the context of physical activity interventions as individuals within the different clusters might benefit most from different intervention approaches. In addition, this study shows that cluster analysis is a useful method for differentiating between motivational profiles in large groups of individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.

AB - BACKGROUND: In order to promote physical activity uptake and maintenance in individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines, it is important to increase our understanding of physical activity motivation among this group. The present study aimed to examine motivational profiles in a large sample of adults who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.METHODS: The sample for this study consisted of 2473 individuals (31.4% male; age 44.6 ± 12.9). In order to generate motivational profiles based on motivational regulation, a cluster analysis was conducted. One-way analyses of variance were then used to compare the clusters in terms of demographics, physical activity level, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active.RESULTS: Three motivational clusters were derived based on motivational regulation scores: a low motivation cluster, a controlled motivation cluster and an autonomous motivation cluster. These clusters differed significantly from each other with respect to physical activity behavior, motivation to be active and subjective experience while being active. Overall, the autonomous motivation cluster displayed more favorable characteristics compared to the other two clusters.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide additional support for the importance of autonomous motivation in the context of physical activity behavior. The three derived clusters may be relevant in the context of physical activity interventions as individuals within the different clusters might benefit most from different intervention approaches. In addition, this study shows that cluster analysis is a useful method for differentiating between motivational profiles in large groups of individuals who do not comply with physical activity guidelines.

U2 - 10.1186/s40359-015-0059-2

DO - 10.1186/s40359-015-0059-2

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1

JO - BMC Psychology

JF - BMC Psychology

SN - 2050-7283

IS - 1

ER -