TY - JOUR
T1 - Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology
T2 - results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology society
AU - Kwasnicka, Dominika
AU - ten Hoor, Gill A.
AU - van Dongen, Anne
AU - Gruszczynska, Ewa
AU - Hagger, Martin S.
AU - Hamilton, Kyra
AU - Hankonen, Nelli
AU - Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani
AU - Kotzur, Marie
AU - Noone, Chris
AU - Rothman, Alexander J.
AU - Toomey, Elaine
AU - Warner, Lisa Marie
AU - Kok, Gerjo
AU - Peters, GJ
AU - Luszczynska, Aleksandra
PY - 2021/7/3
Y1 - 2021/7/3
N2 - The article describes a position statement and recommendations for actions that need to be taken to develop best practices for promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology endorsed at a Synergy Expert Group Meeting. Sixteen Synergy Meeting participants developed a set of recommendations for researchers, gatekeepers, and research end-users. The group process followed a nominal group technique and voting system to elicit and decide on the most relevant and topical issues. Seventeen priority areas were listed and voted on, 15 of them were recommended by the group. Specifically, the following priority actions for health psychology were endorsed: (1) for researchers: advancing when and how to make data open and accessible at various research stages and understanding researchers’ beliefs and attitudes regarding open data; (2) for educators: integrating open science in research curricula, e.g., through online open science training modules, promoting preregistration, transparent reporting, open data and applying open science as a learning tool; (3) for journal editors: providing an open science statement, and open data policies, including a minimal requirements submission checklist. Health psychology societies and journal editors should collaborate in order to develop a coordinated plan for research integrity and open science promotion across behavioural disciplines.
AB - The article describes a position statement and recommendations for actions that need to be taken to develop best practices for promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology endorsed at a Synergy Expert Group Meeting. Sixteen Synergy Meeting participants developed a set of recommendations for researchers, gatekeepers, and research end-users. The group process followed a nominal group technique and voting system to elicit and decide on the most relevant and topical issues. Seventeen priority areas were listed and voted on, 15 of them were recommended by the group. Specifically, the following priority actions for health psychology were endorsed: (1) for researchers: advancing when and how to make data open and accessible at various research stages and understanding researchers’ beliefs and attitudes regarding open data; (2) for educators: integrating open science in research curricula, e.g., through online open science training modules, promoting preregistration, transparent reporting, open data and applying open science as a learning tool; (3) for journal editors: providing an open science statement, and open data policies, including a minimal requirements submission checklist. Health psychology societies and journal editors should collaborate in order to develop a coordinated plan for research integrity and open science promotion across behavioural disciplines.
KW - Health psychology
KW - Integrity
KW - Open access
KW - Open science
KW - Replication
KW - replication
KW - open access
KW - integrity
KW - health psychology
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wos-integration-pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000590651600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037
DO - 10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037
M3 - Article
C2 - 33198583
SN - 1743-7199
VL - 15
SP - 333
EP - 349
JO - Health Psychology Review
JF - Health Psychology Review
IS - 3
ER -