Prosocial versus Instrumental Motives for Interpersonal Emotion Regulation

Karen Niven, A.P. Henkel, Jennifer Hanratty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Why do people try to influence the way others feel? Previous research offers two competing accounts of people’s motives for attempting to regulate others’ emotions. The instrumental account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit their own goal pursuit. Conversely, the prosocial account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit others’ goals. This article juxtaposes these accounts across two studies. Study 1 demonstrates that when given the chance to benefit themselves through their interpersonal emotion regulation, people choose to do so, even when this involves making a friend feel unpleasant. Yet when given the chance to benefit a friend through interpersonal emotion regulation, with no personal gains, people also choose to do so. Study 2 reveals no overall tendencies towards either motive when people can choose between benefitting themselves or a friend through their interpersonal emotion regulation. However, people’s motives can be reliably predicted by their values: individuals with high values of care and concern for others show a greater tendency to regulate a friend’s emotions prosocially and a lower tendency towards instrumentality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-96
JournalJournal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Volume3
Issue number2
Early online date17 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

emotion
Values

Keywords

  • interpersonal emotion regulation
  • emotion regulation
  • motivation
  • prosocial
  • instrumental

Cite this

@article{bcaf9b9e873b43e186c2eddd6db8ffc3,
title = "Prosocial versus Instrumental Motives for Interpersonal Emotion Regulation",
abstract = "Why do people try to influence the way others feel? Previous research offers two competing accounts of people’s motives for attempting to regulate others’ emotions. The instrumental account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit their own goal pursuit. Conversely, the prosocial account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit others’ goals. This article juxtaposes these accounts across two studies. Study 1 demonstrates that when given the chance to benefit themselves through their interpersonal emotion regulation, people choose to do so, even when this involves making a friend feel unpleasant. Yet when given the chance to benefit a friend through interpersonal emotion regulation, with no personal gains, people also choose to do so. Study 2 reveals no overall tendencies towards either motive when people can choose between benefitting themselves or a friend through their interpersonal emotion regulation. However, people’s motives can be reliably predicted by their values: individuals with high values of care and concern for others show a greater tendency to regulate a friend’s emotions prosocially and a lower tendency towards instrumentality.",
keywords = "interpersonal emotion regulation, emotion regulation, motivation, prosocial, instrumental",
author = "Karen Niven and A.P. Henkel and Jennifer Hanratty",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1002/jts5.36",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "85--96",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology",
issn = "2475-0387",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Prosocial versus Instrumental Motives for Interpersonal Emotion Regulation. / Niven, Karen; Henkel, A.P.; Hanratty, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019, p. 85-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosocial versus Instrumental Motives for Interpersonal Emotion Regulation

AU - Niven, Karen

AU - Henkel, A.P.

AU - Hanratty, Jennifer

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Why do people try to influence the way others feel? Previous research offers two competing accounts of people’s motives for attempting to regulate others’ emotions. The instrumental account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit their own goal pursuit. Conversely, the prosocial account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit others’ goals. This article juxtaposes these accounts across two studies. Study 1 demonstrates that when given the chance to benefit themselves through their interpersonal emotion regulation, people choose to do so, even when this involves making a friend feel unpleasant. Yet when given the chance to benefit a friend through interpersonal emotion regulation, with no personal gains, people also choose to do so. Study 2 reveals no overall tendencies towards either motive when people can choose between benefitting themselves or a friend through their interpersonal emotion regulation. However, people’s motives can be reliably predicted by their values: individuals with high values of care and concern for others show a greater tendency to regulate a friend’s emotions prosocially and a lower tendency towards instrumentality.

AB - Why do people try to influence the way others feel? Previous research offers two competing accounts of people’s motives for attempting to regulate others’ emotions. The instrumental account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit their own goal pursuit. Conversely, the prosocial account holds that people use interpersonal emotion regulation to benefit others’ goals. This article juxtaposes these accounts across two studies. Study 1 demonstrates that when given the chance to benefit themselves through their interpersonal emotion regulation, people choose to do so, even when this involves making a friend feel unpleasant. Yet when given the chance to benefit a friend through interpersonal emotion regulation, with no personal gains, people also choose to do so. Study 2 reveals no overall tendencies towards either motive when people can choose between benefitting themselves or a friend through their interpersonal emotion regulation. However, people’s motives can be reliably predicted by their values: individuals with high values of care and concern for others show a greater tendency to regulate a friend’s emotions prosocially and a lower tendency towards instrumentality.

KW - interpersonal emotion regulation

KW - emotion regulation

KW - motivation

KW - prosocial

KW - instrumental

U2 - 10.1002/jts5.36

DO - 10.1002/jts5.36

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 85

EP - 96

JO - Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology

SN - 2475-0387

IS - 2

ER -