Protect, respect, remedy, and report? Development of human rights reporting in the context of formal institutional settings

F.R. Hubers, Thomas Thijssens*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of formal institutions, in particular legislation,on corporate human rights (HR) reporting. We use a mixed-method approach, com-bining qualitative institutional analysis of two European countries—the Netherlandsand Switzerland—with quantitative content analysis of annual reports of 94 listedcompanies for the years 2007 to 2019 (1222 firm-years). We find that, for eachobserved book year, companies in the Netherlands are more willing to disclose HRinformation than companies in Switzerland, which we explain by their differences informal institutional development. Our results indicate that formal institutions areessential determinants in HR reporting, both in the willingness of companies to dis-close and the extensiveness of disclosure. Moreover, we observe a significant posi-tive impact of legislation on HR reporting but find that the overall compliance levelsof affected companies are low. We contribute to prior research, by providing evi-dence on the development and institutional drivers of HR reporting, a largely over-looked branch of sustainability reporting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2783-2798
Number of pages16
JournalCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Volume30
Issue number6
Early online date5 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • formal institutions
  • human rights
  • longitudinal analysis
  • sustainability reporting
  • content analysis
  • mandatory reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protect, respect, remedy, and report? Development of human rights reporting in the context of formal institutional settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this