Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection

Michelle L. Nugteren, H.M. Jarodzka, Liesbeth Kester, Jeroen Van Merriënboer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Self-assessment and task selection are important self-regulated learning skills for secondary school students. More specifically, selecting new tasks based on self-assessments is very important for them, because teachers are not always present or able to select tasks for them individually. However, little is known about the processes underlying these self-regulated learning skills, and thus no guidelines exist for teaching self-assessment and the selection of subsequent learning-tasks. We propose a model for self-regulated learning-task selection (SRLTS) which represents a possible pathway for the task-selection process, and which students could use as a norm when making task selections. The model could help students to decide what possible new tasks might be suitable for their current skill level, based on self-assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate to what extent secondary school students select learning tasks according to this model, and whether they use self-assessments to this end. Secondary school students (N = 15) selected learning tasks in the domain of genetics from a structured task database. The tasks varied in difficulty and amount of support provided (i.e., completion problems vs. traditional problems). We used eye tracking, performance estimates, estimates of mental effort, judgments of learning, and open questions to gain more insight in what students focus on and think about when selecting a task. Results suggest that students roughly follow the SRLTS model, but they base their decisions on inaccurate self-assessments. This implies that students might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice, which could provide feedback on self-assessments and stimulate students to use self-assessment information as input for task selection in the way the model prescribes to optimize their learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357 – 381
Number of pages25
JournalInstructional Science
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

self-assessment
self-regulation
secondary school
learning
student
present
Teaching
teacher

Keywords

  • COGNITIVE-LOAD APPROACH
  • EDUCATION
  • EFFICIENCY
  • Eye tracking
  • FEEDBACK
  • INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN
  • INVOLVEMENT
  • Judgments of learning
  • METACOGNITION
  • Mental effort
  • PERSPECTIVE
  • SHARED CONTROL
  • Self-assessment
  • Task selection
  • VARIABILITY

Cite this

Nugteren, Michelle L. ; Jarodzka, H.M. ; Kester, Liesbeth ; Van Merriënboer, Jeroen. / Self-regulation of secondary school students : self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. In: Instructional Science. 2018 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 357 – 381.
@article{2759d9c4c9dc4b3aab3ffe67022b42c9,
title = "Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection",
abstract = "Self-assessment and task selection are important self-regulated learning skills for secondary school students. More specifically, selecting new tasks based on self-assessments is very important for them, because teachers are not always present or able to select tasks for them individually. However, little is known about the processes underlying these self-regulated learning skills, and thus no guidelines exist for teaching self-assessment and the selection of subsequent learning-tasks. We propose a model for self-regulated learning-task selection (SRLTS) which represents a possible pathway for the task-selection process, and which students could use as a norm when making task selections. The model could help students to decide what possible new tasks might be suitable for their current skill level, based on self-assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate to what extent secondary school students select learning tasks according to this model, and whether they use self-assessments to this end. Secondary school students (N = 15) selected learning tasks in the domain of genetics from a structured task database. The tasks varied in difficulty and amount of support provided (i.e., completion problems vs. traditional problems). We used eye tracking, performance estimates, estimates of mental effort, judgments of learning, and open questions to gain more insight in what students focus on and think about when selecting a task. Results suggest that students roughly follow the SRLTS model, but they base their decisions on inaccurate self-assessments. This implies that students might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice, which could provide feedback on self-assessments and stimulate students to use self-assessment information as input for task selection in the way the model prescribes to optimize their learning.",
keywords = "COGNITIVE-LOAD APPROACH, EDUCATION, EFFICIENCY, Eye tracking, FEEDBACK, INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN, INVOLVEMENT, Judgments of learning, METACOGNITION, Mental effort, PERSPECTIVE, SHARED CONTROL, Self-assessment, Task selection, VARIABILITY",
author = "Nugteren, {Michelle L.} and H.M. Jarodzka and Liesbeth Kester and {Van Merri{\"e}nboer}, Jeroen",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "357 – 381",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Self-regulation of secondary school students : self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. / Nugteren, Michelle L.; Jarodzka, H.M.; Kester, Liesbeth; Van Merriënboer, Jeroen.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 46, No. 3, 06.2018, p. 357 – 381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-regulation of secondary school students

T2 - self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection

AU - Nugteren, Michelle L.

AU - Jarodzka, H.M.

AU - Kester, Liesbeth

AU - Van Merriënboer, Jeroen

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Self-assessment and task selection are important self-regulated learning skills for secondary school students. More specifically, selecting new tasks based on self-assessments is very important for them, because teachers are not always present or able to select tasks for them individually. However, little is known about the processes underlying these self-regulated learning skills, and thus no guidelines exist for teaching self-assessment and the selection of subsequent learning-tasks. We propose a model for self-regulated learning-task selection (SRLTS) which represents a possible pathway for the task-selection process, and which students could use as a norm when making task selections. The model could help students to decide what possible new tasks might be suitable for their current skill level, based on self-assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate to what extent secondary school students select learning tasks according to this model, and whether they use self-assessments to this end. Secondary school students (N = 15) selected learning tasks in the domain of genetics from a structured task database. The tasks varied in difficulty and amount of support provided (i.e., completion problems vs. traditional problems). We used eye tracking, performance estimates, estimates of mental effort, judgments of learning, and open questions to gain more insight in what students focus on and think about when selecting a task. Results suggest that students roughly follow the SRLTS model, but they base their decisions on inaccurate self-assessments. This implies that students might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice, which could provide feedback on self-assessments and stimulate students to use self-assessment information as input for task selection in the way the model prescribes to optimize their learning.

AB - Self-assessment and task selection are important self-regulated learning skills for secondary school students. More specifically, selecting new tasks based on self-assessments is very important for them, because teachers are not always present or able to select tasks for them individually. However, little is known about the processes underlying these self-regulated learning skills, and thus no guidelines exist for teaching self-assessment and the selection of subsequent learning-tasks. We propose a model for self-regulated learning-task selection (SRLTS) which represents a possible pathway for the task-selection process, and which students could use as a norm when making task selections. The model could help students to decide what possible new tasks might be suitable for their current skill level, based on self-assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate to what extent secondary school students select learning tasks according to this model, and whether they use self-assessments to this end. Secondary school students (N = 15) selected learning tasks in the domain of genetics from a structured task database. The tasks varied in difficulty and amount of support provided (i.e., completion problems vs. traditional problems). We used eye tracking, performance estimates, estimates of mental effort, judgments of learning, and open questions to gain more insight in what students focus on and think about when selecting a task. Results suggest that students roughly follow the SRLTS model, but they base their decisions on inaccurate self-assessments. This implies that students might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice, which could provide feedback on self-assessments and stimulate students to use self-assessment information as input for task selection in the way the model prescribes to optimize their learning.

KW - COGNITIVE-LOAD APPROACH

KW - EDUCATION

KW - EFFICIENCY

KW - Eye tracking

KW - FEEDBACK

KW - INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN

KW - INVOLVEMENT

KW - Judgments of learning

KW - METACOGNITION

KW - Mental effort

KW - PERSPECTIVE

KW - SHARED CONTROL

KW - Self-assessment

KW - Task selection

KW - VARIABILITY

U2 - 10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2

DO - 10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 357

EP - 381

JO - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 3

ER -