Should We Tell the Recruiter That We Value a Good Work–Life Balance?

Karin Proost, Dieter Verhaest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although both employees and organizations increasingly realize the importance of a good work–life balance, it remains unclear how recruiters react when applicants mention a desire for balance on their CV. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 96) in which one group of participants received a CV of an applicant who valued work–life balance versus a CV from which this information was omitted. Based on signaling theory and gender–role congruence theory, we suggested that mentioning balance on one’s CV would lead to less favorable recruitment outcomes through a lower work ethic, especially for men. The results supported this mediation hypothesis but, contrary to expectations, showed that the mediation effect was only significant for women.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-130
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personnel psychology
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Ethics
Work-life balance
Work ethic
Employees
Signaling theory
Mediation effect
Gender roles
Congruence
Experiment
Mediation

Keywords

  • work-life balance
  • recruitment outcomes
  • gender-role congruity theory
  • hiring intentions
  • work ethic

Cite this

@article{a95862aae5fc414fb0028807a4361f8a,
title = "Should We Tell the Recruiter That We Value a Good Work–Life Balance?",
abstract = "Although both employees and organizations increasingly realize the importance of a good work–life balance, it remains unclear how recruiters react when applicants mention a desire for balance on their CV. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 96) in which one group of participants received a CV of an applicant who valued work–life balance versus a CV from which this information was omitted. Based on signaling theory and gender–role congruence theory, we suggested that mentioning balance on one’s CV would lead to less favorable recruitment outcomes through a lower work ethic, especially for men. The results supported this mediation hypothesis but, contrary to expectations, showed that the mediation effect was only significant for women.",
keywords = "work-life balance, recruitment outcomes, gender-role congruity theory, hiring intentions, work ethic",
author = "Karin Proost and Dieter Verhaest",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1027/1866-5888/a000214",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "120--130",
journal = "Journal of Personnel psychology",
issn = "1866-5888",
publisher = "HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS",
number = "3",

}

Should We Tell the Recruiter That We Value a Good Work–Life Balance? / Proost, Karin; Verhaest, Dieter.

In: Journal of Personnel psychology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 07.2018, p. 120-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should We Tell the Recruiter That We Value a Good Work–Life Balance?

AU - Proost, Karin

AU - Verhaest, Dieter

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Although both employees and organizations increasingly realize the importance of a good work–life balance, it remains unclear how recruiters react when applicants mention a desire for balance on their CV. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 96) in which one group of participants received a CV of an applicant who valued work–life balance versus a CV from which this information was omitted. Based on signaling theory and gender–role congruence theory, we suggested that mentioning balance on one’s CV would lead to less favorable recruitment outcomes through a lower work ethic, especially for men. The results supported this mediation hypothesis but, contrary to expectations, showed that the mediation effect was only significant for women.

AB - Although both employees and organizations increasingly realize the importance of a good work–life balance, it remains unclear how recruiters react when applicants mention a desire for balance on their CV. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 96) in which one group of participants received a CV of an applicant who valued work–life balance versus a CV from which this information was omitted. Based on signaling theory and gender–role congruence theory, we suggested that mentioning balance on one’s CV would lead to less favorable recruitment outcomes through a lower work ethic, especially for men. The results supported this mediation hypothesis but, contrary to expectations, showed that the mediation effect was only significant for women.

KW - work-life balance

KW - recruitment outcomes

KW - gender-role congruity theory

KW - hiring intentions

KW - work ethic

U2 - 10.1027/1866-5888/a000214

DO - 10.1027/1866-5888/a000214

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 120

EP - 130

JO - Journal of Personnel psychology

JF - Journal of Personnel psychology

SN - 1866-5888

IS - 3

ER -