Abstract
Although both employees and organizations increasingly realize the importance of a good work–life balance, it remains unclear how recruiters react when applicants mention a desire for balance on their CV. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N = 96) in which one group of participants received a CV of an applicant who valued work–life balance versus a CV from which this information was omitted. Based on signaling theory and gender–role congruence theory, we suggested that mentioning balance on one’s CV would lead to less favorable recruitment outcomes through a lower work ethic, especially for men. The results supported this mediation hypothesis but, contrary to expectations, showed that the mediation effect was only significant for women.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 120-130 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Personnel psychology |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- APPLICANT ATTRACTION
- ATTRACTION
- BENEFITS
- DISCRIMINATION
- FAMILY CONFLICT
- JOB APPLICANTS
- PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT
- PREGNANT JOB APPLICANTS
- REDUCING BIASES
- SELECTION
- SELECTION INTERVIEW
- SELF-PROMOTION
- SIGNALING THEORY
- STRUCTURED INTERVIEW
- WOMEN
- gender-role congruity theory
- hiring intentions
- recruitment outcomes
- work ethic
- work-life balance