The governance of adaptation: choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature

Dave Huitema*, William Neil Adger, Frans Berkhout, Eric Massey, Daniel Mazmanian, Stefania Munaretto, Ryan Plummer, Catrien C. J. A. M. Termeer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The governance of climate adaptation involves the collective efforts of multiple societal actors to address problems, or to reap the benefits, associated with impacts of climate change. Governing involves the creation of institutions, rules and organizations, and the selection of normative principles to guide problem solution and institution building. We argue that actors involved in governing climate change adaptation, as climate change governance regimes evolve, inevitably must engage in making choices, for instance on problem definitions, jurisdictional levels, on modes of governance and policy instruments, and on the timing of interventions. Yet little is known about how and why these choices are made in practice, and how such choices affect the outcomes of our efforts to govern adaptation. In this introduction we review the current state of evidence and the specific contribution of the articles published in this Special Feature, which are aimed at bringing greater clarity in these matters, and thereby informing both governance theory and practice. Collectively, the contributing papers suggest that the way issues are defined has important consequences for the support for governance interventions, and their effectiveness. The articles suggest that currently the emphasis in adaptation governance is on the local and regional levels, while underscoring the benefits of interventions and governance at higher jurisdictional levels in terms of visioning and scaling-up effective approaches. The articles suggest that there is a central role of government agencies in leading governance interventions to address spillover effects, to provide public goods, and to promote the long-term perspectives for planning. They highlight the issue of justice in the governance of adaptation showing how governance measures have wide distributional consequences, including the potential to amplify existing inequalities, access to resources, or generating new injustices through distribution of risks. For several of these findings, future research directions are suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Article number37
Number of pages15
JournalEcology and Society
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • climate change
  • governance
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION
  • ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT
  • POLICY INNOVATION
  • WATER MANAGEMENT
  • NETHERLANDS
  • STRATEGIES
  • EUROPE

Cite this

Huitema, D., Adger, W. N., Berkhout, F., Massey, E., Mazmanian, D., Munaretto, S., ... Termeer, C. C. J. A. M. (2016). The governance of adaptation: choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature. Ecology and Society, 21(3), [37]. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08797-210337
Huitema, Dave ; Adger, William Neil ; Berkhout, Frans ; Massey, Eric ; Mazmanian, Daniel ; Munaretto, Stefania ; Plummer, Ryan ; Termeer, Catrien C. J. A. M. / The governance of adaptation : choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature. In: Ecology and Society. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 3.
@article{0a164c3d913248d890fbf79313527f10,
title = "The governance of adaptation: choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature",
abstract = "The governance of climate adaptation involves the collective efforts of multiple societal actors to address problems, or to reap the benefits, associated with impacts of climate change. Governing involves the creation of institutions, rules and organizations, and the selection of normative principles to guide problem solution and institution building. We argue that actors involved in governing climate change adaptation, as climate change governance regimes evolve, inevitably must engage in making choices, for instance on problem definitions, jurisdictional levels, on modes of governance and policy instruments, and on the timing of interventions. Yet little is known about how and why these choices are made in practice, and how such choices affect the outcomes of our efforts to govern adaptation. In this introduction we review the current state of evidence and the specific contribution of the articles published in this Special Feature, which are aimed at bringing greater clarity in these matters, and thereby informing both governance theory and practice. Collectively, the contributing papers suggest that the way issues are defined has important consequences for the support for governance interventions, and their effectiveness. The articles suggest that currently the emphasis in adaptation governance is on the local and regional levels, while underscoring the benefits of interventions and governance at higher jurisdictional levels in terms of visioning and scaling-up effective approaches. The articles suggest that there is a central role of government agencies in leading governance interventions to address spillover effects, to provide public goods, and to promote the long-term perspectives for planning. They highlight the issue of justice in the governance of adaptation showing how governance measures have wide distributional consequences, including the potential to amplify existing inequalities, access to resources, or generating new injustices through distribution of risks. For several of these findings, future research directions are suggested.",
keywords = "adaptation, climate change, governance, CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT, POLICY INNOVATION, WATER MANAGEMENT, NETHERLANDS, STRATEGIES, EUROPE",
author = "Dave Huitema and Adger, {William Neil} and Frans Berkhout and Eric Massey and Daniel Mazmanian and Stefania Munaretto and Ryan Plummer and Termeer, {Catrien C. J. A. M.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.5751/ES-08797-210337",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "3",

}

Huitema, D, Adger, WN, Berkhout, F, Massey, E, Mazmanian, D, Munaretto, S, Plummer, R & Termeer, CCJAM 2016, 'The governance of adaptation: choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature', Ecology and Society, vol. 21, no. 3, 37. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08797-210337

The governance of adaptation : choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature. / Huitema, Dave; Adger, William Neil; Berkhout, Frans; Massey, Eric; Mazmanian, Daniel; Munaretto, Stefania; Plummer, Ryan; Termeer, Catrien C. J. A. M.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 37, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The governance of adaptation

T2 - choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the Special Feature

AU - Huitema, Dave

AU - Adger, William Neil

AU - Berkhout, Frans

AU - Massey, Eric

AU - Mazmanian, Daniel

AU - Munaretto, Stefania

AU - Plummer, Ryan

AU - Termeer, Catrien C. J. A. M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The governance of climate adaptation involves the collective efforts of multiple societal actors to address problems, or to reap the benefits, associated with impacts of climate change. Governing involves the creation of institutions, rules and organizations, and the selection of normative principles to guide problem solution and institution building. We argue that actors involved in governing climate change adaptation, as climate change governance regimes evolve, inevitably must engage in making choices, for instance on problem definitions, jurisdictional levels, on modes of governance and policy instruments, and on the timing of interventions. Yet little is known about how and why these choices are made in practice, and how such choices affect the outcomes of our efforts to govern adaptation. In this introduction we review the current state of evidence and the specific contribution of the articles published in this Special Feature, which are aimed at bringing greater clarity in these matters, and thereby informing both governance theory and practice. Collectively, the contributing papers suggest that the way issues are defined has important consequences for the support for governance interventions, and their effectiveness. The articles suggest that currently the emphasis in adaptation governance is on the local and regional levels, while underscoring the benefits of interventions and governance at higher jurisdictional levels in terms of visioning and scaling-up effective approaches. The articles suggest that there is a central role of government agencies in leading governance interventions to address spillover effects, to provide public goods, and to promote the long-term perspectives for planning. They highlight the issue of justice in the governance of adaptation showing how governance measures have wide distributional consequences, including the potential to amplify existing inequalities, access to resources, or generating new injustices through distribution of risks. For several of these findings, future research directions are suggested.

AB - The governance of climate adaptation involves the collective efforts of multiple societal actors to address problems, or to reap the benefits, associated with impacts of climate change. Governing involves the creation of institutions, rules and organizations, and the selection of normative principles to guide problem solution and institution building. We argue that actors involved in governing climate change adaptation, as climate change governance regimes evolve, inevitably must engage in making choices, for instance on problem definitions, jurisdictional levels, on modes of governance and policy instruments, and on the timing of interventions. Yet little is known about how and why these choices are made in practice, and how such choices affect the outcomes of our efforts to govern adaptation. In this introduction we review the current state of evidence and the specific contribution of the articles published in this Special Feature, which are aimed at bringing greater clarity in these matters, and thereby informing both governance theory and practice. Collectively, the contributing papers suggest that the way issues are defined has important consequences for the support for governance interventions, and their effectiveness. The articles suggest that currently the emphasis in adaptation governance is on the local and regional levels, while underscoring the benefits of interventions and governance at higher jurisdictional levels in terms of visioning and scaling-up effective approaches. The articles suggest that there is a central role of government agencies in leading governance interventions to address spillover effects, to provide public goods, and to promote the long-term perspectives for planning. They highlight the issue of justice in the governance of adaptation showing how governance measures have wide distributional consequences, including the potential to amplify existing inequalities, access to resources, or generating new injustices through distribution of risks. For several of these findings, future research directions are suggested.

KW - adaptation

KW - climate change

KW - governance

KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION

KW - ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT

KW - POLICY INNOVATION

KW - WATER MANAGEMENT

KW - NETHERLANDS

KW - STRATEGIES

KW - EUROPE

U2 - 10.5751/ES-08797-210337

DO - 10.5751/ES-08797-210337

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 3

M1 - 37

ER -