The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing

Werner Rutten*, Joyce Blaas-Franken, Harry Martin

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    76 Citations (Web of Science)

    Abstract

    Purpose - This paper aims to explore the differences in the level of knowledge sharing between co-workers in high versus low trust situations, for cognition-based trust and for affect-based trust as well as implicit and explicit knowledge.

    Design/methodology/approach - The differences were examined through data provided by 102 professionals working for a financial organization in The Netherlands.

    Findings - The differences in the level of knowledge sharing in high versus low trust situations are significant. The effect is larger for affect-based trust and for implicit knowledge.

    Research limitations/implications - The survey has been conducted within one organization only.

    Practical implications - Organizations should realize the importance of trust between their co-workers, and in general, there is much to gain by increasing the levels of trust between co-workers, as this will also increase knowledge sharing between co-workers.

    Originality/value - Previous studies have not examined the situation of low trust and its effect on the level of knowledge sharing within a homogeneous group of co-workers.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)199-214
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Knowledge Management
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Tacit knowledge
    • Knowledge sharing
    • Affect based trust
    • Cognition based trust
    • Explicit knowledge
    • Implicit knowledge
    • TACIT KNOWLEDGE
    • INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
    • INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY
    • VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES
    • ORGANIZATIONS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this