Abstract
The soaring compensation levels of chief executive officers (CEOs) have spurred an intense debate about its outcomes. This paper examines an understudied outcome in this regard: employee engagement. Using a dynamic panel model with data from 336 publicly listed firms across 26 countries, we find that employee engagement is generally unaffected by CEO (over)compensation. However, negative effects emerge under specific conditions. First, employee engagement declines with negative media coverage about CEO compensation. Second, employee engagement declines with greater CEO (over)compensation in the financial sector, which is a sector with extraordinary levels of CEO compensation and compensation controversies. The findings suggest that a ceiling effect exists, at which point negative effects emerge and employee engagement becomes relevant in determining CEO compensation policies, while the general insensitivity of employee engagement to CEO compensation can help explain the soaring CEO compensation levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 607-633 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Review of Managerial Science |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 17 Mar 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |
Keywords
- Compensation controversy
- EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION
- Executive compensation
- FIRM SIZE
- Financial sector
- INEQUALITY
- Job attitudes
- MANAGERS
- Media coverage
- PANEL-DATA
- PERCEPTIONS
- SATISFACTION
- TOP INCOMES
- WALL-STREET
- WORKPLACE