The Legitimacy of Humanitarian Interventions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

According tomany international lawyers, humanitarian interventions without authorization by the UN Security Council are unlawful, but are sometimes morally justified. This discrepancy between legality and legitimacy has led to proposals for making international law more congruent withmorality. This article examines the legitimacy of humanitarian interventions by discussing themajor justifications by Walzer, Rawls, and Teso´ n. It argues that these justifications are open-ended: they fail to show that intervention should be limited to cases of violation of basic human rights, and do not categorically rule out intervention in the name of liberal and democratic rights. This is one more reason for being cautious with attempts to establish a law of humanitarian intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-692
Number of pages23
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume19
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

humanitarian intervention
legitimacy
UN Security Council
legality
authorization
lawyer
international law
human rights
Law

Cite this

@article{e4118a282e514d2c9321ecaa77117aa9,
title = "The Legitimacy of Humanitarian Interventions",
abstract = "According tomany international lawyers, humanitarian interventions without authorization by the UN Security Council are unlawful, but are sometimes morally justified. This discrepancy between legality and legitimacy has led to proposals for making international law more congruent withmorality. This article examines the legitimacy of humanitarian interventions by discussing themajor justifications by Walzer, Rawls, and Teso´ n. It argues that these justifications are open-ended: they fail to show that intervention should be limited to cases of violation of basic human rights, and do not categorically rule out intervention in the name of liberal and democratic rights. This is one more reason for being cautious with attempts to establish a law of humanitarian intervention.",
author = "R. Janse",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "669--692",
journal = "Leiden Journal of International Law",
issn = "0922-1565",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

The Legitimacy of Humanitarian Interventions. / Janse, R.

In: Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, p. 669-692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Legitimacy of Humanitarian Interventions

AU - Janse, R.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - According tomany international lawyers, humanitarian interventions without authorization by the UN Security Council are unlawful, but are sometimes morally justified. This discrepancy between legality and legitimacy has led to proposals for making international law more congruent withmorality. This article examines the legitimacy of humanitarian interventions by discussing themajor justifications by Walzer, Rawls, and Teso´ n. It argues that these justifications are open-ended: they fail to show that intervention should be limited to cases of violation of basic human rights, and do not categorically rule out intervention in the name of liberal and democratic rights. This is one more reason for being cautious with attempts to establish a law of humanitarian intervention.

AB - According tomany international lawyers, humanitarian interventions without authorization by the UN Security Council are unlawful, but are sometimes morally justified. This discrepancy between legality and legitimacy has led to proposals for making international law more congruent withmorality. This article examines the legitimacy of humanitarian interventions by discussing themajor justifications by Walzer, Rawls, and Teso´ n. It argues that these justifications are open-ended: they fail to show that intervention should be limited to cases of violation of basic human rights, and do not categorically rule out intervention in the name of liberal and democratic rights. This is one more reason for being cautious with attempts to establish a law of humanitarian intervention.

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 669

EP - 692

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

SN - 0922-1565

IS - 3

ER -