TY - JOUR
T1 - The relation between driving errors and executive functioning in intellectually able young novice drivers with autism
AU - Ross, Veerle
AU - Jongen, E.M.M.
AU - Brijs, Kris
AU - Vanroelen, Giovanni
AU - Beelen, Caroline
AU - Maltagliati, I.
AU - van Beers, Martijn
AU - Ruiter, Rob
AU - Brijs, Tom
AU - Alhajyaseen, W.
AU - Soliman, A.
AU - Wets, Geert
AU - Vanvuchelen, Marleen
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Driving is a complex, goal-directed task. ASD can be related to impairments in executive functioning (EF), which may interfere with driving. This study aimed to investigate (1) if 16 young novice drivers with ASD exhibited a divergent performance on EF tests compared to 18 neurotypical peers, (2) if ASD participants exhibited a divergent driving performance compared to their neurotypical peers, and (3) if differences in driving performance would be related by the performance on the EF tasks. All participants completed a driving simulator scenario and computer-task battery. Driving error classification allowed the selection of several driving measures (e.g., collisions, speeding). Three EF tasks measuring working memory (WM), attention, and response inhibition were included. Results indicated lower WM and attention performance of the ASD participants compared to the control group, whereas response inhibition was similar across groups. Furthermore, the current study demonstrated that people with ASD can be considered as capable drivers once they have learned how to drive, that it is important to take different types of hazards into account, and that EF performance is related to driving performance. This relation may be different for drivers with and without ASD. Moreover, the relation may depend on the specific EFs and driving parameters under investigation. Future research could focus on the very early phases of driving education, and include additional driving and EF measures.
AB - Driving is a complex, goal-directed task. ASD can be related to impairments in executive functioning (EF), which may interfere with driving. This study aimed to investigate (1) if 16 young novice drivers with ASD exhibited a divergent performance on EF tests compared to 18 neurotypical peers, (2) if ASD participants exhibited a divergent driving performance compared to their neurotypical peers, and (3) if differences in driving performance would be related by the performance on the EF tasks. All participants completed a driving simulator scenario and computer-task battery. Driving error classification allowed the selection of several driving measures (e.g., collisions, speeding). Three EF tasks measuring working memory (WM), attention, and response inhibition were included. Results indicated lower WM and attention performance of the ASD participants compared to the control group, whereas response inhibition was similar across groups. Furthermore, the current study demonstrated that people with ASD can be considered as capable drivers once they have learned how to drive, that it is important to take different types of hazards into account, and that EF performance is related to driving performance. This relation may be different for drivers with and without ASD. Moreover, the relation may depend on the specific EFs and driving parameters under investigation. Future research could focus on the very early phases of driving education, and include additional driving and EF measures.
KW - ADULTS
KW - Autism spectrum disorder
KW - BEHAVIOR
KW - COGNITIVE CONTROL
KW - DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
KW - Driving errors
KW - Driving simulation
KW - Executive functioning
KW - FIELD-OF-VIEW
KW - HAZARD PERCEPTION
KW - PERFORMANCE
KW - RESPONSE-INHIBITION
KW - Road hazards
KW - SPECTRUM DISORDER
KW - WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY
KW - Young novice drivers
U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.003
M3 - Article
SN - 1369-8478
VL - 63
SP - 38
EP - 54
JO - Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
JF - Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
ER -