TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between the global mean deep-sea and surface temperature during the Early Eocene
AU - Goudsmit-Harzevoort, Barbara
AU - Lansu, Angelique
AU - Baatsen, Michiel L.J.
AU - von der Heydt, Anna S.
AU - de Winter, Niels J.
AU - Zhang, Yurui
AU - Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
AU - de Boer, Agatha
AU - Chan, Wing-Le
AU - Donnadieu, Yannick
AU - Hutchinson, David K.
AU - Knorr, Gregor
AU - Ladant, Jean-Baptiste
AU - Morozova, Polina
AU - Niezgodzki, Igor
AU - Steinig, Sebastian
AU - Tripati, Aradhna
AU - Zhang, Zhongshi
AU - Zhu, Jiang
AU - Ziegler, Martin
N1 - to Bibl: This is a Pre-Print on Open Archive of Barbara Goudsmit etal. Barbara Goudsmit have published an OUNL MSc Thesis with the same title, but as OUNL Student's MSc Thesis Environmental Sciences, and as published Conference Abstract EGU22. This pre-print is a submitted, in peer-review, article in Journal.
The Journal has an Plain Language Summary:
Plain Language Summary
A widely used indicator of global climate change is the change in global mean(land and sea) surface air temperature (GMSAT). Our current understanding ofthe GMSAT evolution during the last 66 million years is largely based on deep-sea temperature proxies from fossilized micro-organisms and the assumptionthat changes in the global mean deep-sea temperature (GMDST) are similarto those in GMSAT. In short, GMDST and GMSAT are linked via the globalmean sea-surface temperature (GMSST) by assuming that they are both lesssensitive than the GMSST to atmospheric CO2changes by the same degree.The validity of this assumption is essential in our understanding of past climatestates such as the Early Eocene Climate Optimum (EECO, 56–48 million yearsago), a hothouse period characterized by high atmospheric CO2levels. Weanalyzed the relationship between the three global temperature indicators inclimate model simulations of the EECO. Based on linear regression analysis,we find that changes in GMDST can indeed be used to estimate changes inGMSAT during the EECO (regression slope 0.99). Furthermore, paleo-proxies ofGMDST, GMSST, and GMSAT during EECO show the best fit with the modelsimulations having an atmospheric CO2level of 1,680 ppm, which matches paleo-proxies of atmospheric CO2during EECO. This indicates a good fit betweenmodels and proxy-data.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Estimates of global mean near-surface air temperature (global SAT) for the Cenozoic era rely largely on paleo-proxy data of deep-sea temperature (DST), with the assumption that changes in global SAT covary with changes in the global mean deep-sea temperature (global DST) and global mean sea-surface temperature (global SST). We tested the validity of this assumption by analyzing the relationship between global SST, SAT, and DST using 25 different model simulations from the Deep-Time Model Intercomparison Project simulating the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO) with varying CO
2 levels. Similar to the modern situation, we find limited spatial variability in DST, indicating that local DST estimates can be regarded as a first order representative of global DST. In line with previously assumed relationships, linear regression analysis indicates that both global DST and SAT respond stronger to changes in atmospheric CO
2 than global SST by a similar factor. Consequently, this model-based analysis validates the assumption that changes in global DST can be used to estimate changes in global SAT during the early Cenozoic. Paleo-proxy estimates of global DST, SST, and SAT during EECO show the best fit with model simulations with a 1,680 ppm atmospheric CO
2 level. This matches paleo-proxies of EECO atmospheric CO
2, indicating a good fit between models and proxy-data.
AB - Estimates of global mean near-surface air temperature (global SAT) for the Cenozoic era rely largely on paleo-proxy data of deep-sea temperature (DST), with the assumption that changes in global SAT covary with changes in the global mean deep-sea temperature (global DST) and global mean sea-surface temperature (global SST). We tested the validity of this assumption by analyzing the relationship between global SST, SAT, and DST using 25 different model simulations from the Deep-Time Model Intercomparison Project simulating the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO) with varying CO
2 levels. Similar to the modern situation, we find limited spatial variability in DST, indicating that local DST estimates can be regarded as a first order representative of global DST. In line with previously assumed relationships, linear regression analysis indicates that both global DST and SAT respond stronger to changes in atmospheric CO
2 than global SST by a similar factor. Consequently, this model-based analysis validates the assumption that changes in global DST can be used to estimate changes in global SAT during the early Cenozoic. Paleo-proxy estimates of global DST, SST, and SAT during EECO show the best fit with model simulations with a 1,680 ppm atmospheric CO
2 level. This matches paleo-proxies of EECO atmospheric CO
2, indicating a good fit between models and proxy-data.
KW - Climatology
KW - Global Change
KW - Oceanography
KW - Paleoclimatology
KW - Sea-Air Interactions
KW - climate sensitivity
KW - deep-sea temperature
KW - DeepMIP
KW - model-data comparison
KW - early Eocene
U2 - 10.1029/2022PA004532
DO - 10.1029/2022PA004532
M3 - Article
SN - 2572-4517
VL - 38
JO - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
JF - Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
IS - 3
M1 - e2022PA004532
ER -