The Social Dimension of Service Interactions: Observer Reactions to Customer Incivility

A.P. Henkel, Johannes Boegershausen, Anat Rafaeli, Jos Lemmink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Service interactions run a gamut from an instrumental self-focus to full social appreciation. Observing another customer’s incivility toward a frontline employee can emphasize social concerns as guiding principles for the observer’s own service interaction. Five studies test these dynamics; the results reveal that an incivility incident leads observers to prioritize social over market concerns. This reprioritization becomes manifest in a subsequent service interaction through increased feelings of warmth toward the employee who experienced incivility. In turn, feelings of warmth prompt observers to provide emotional support to the affected employee. Yet such prosocial inclinations are less likely when an employee is held responsible for or reciprocates incivility. Finally, this article also examines the effects of different employee reaction strategies on observers’ inferences about the employee and the service firm, showing that observers are most positively disposed toward the employee and the firm when the former reacts to incivility with a polite reprimand. Together, the results suggest that, contrary to past theorizing, observing customers may contribute to employee well-being, contingent on appropriate employee responses. Notably, the commonly prescribed polite, submissive employee reaction that requires emotional labor may not be the most desirable reaction—neither for the employee nor for the firm.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-134
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Service Research
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date3 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

customer
employee
Personnel
interaction
firm
Observer
Social dimension
Incivility
Employees
Interaction
incident
well-being
labor
market

Keywords

  • customer incivility
  • third-party observers
  • employee reaction
  • market versus social mind set
  • consumer misbehavior

Cite this

Henkel, A.P. ; Boegershausen, Johannes ; Rafaeli, Anat ; Lemmink, Jos. / The Social Dimension of Service Interactions : Observer Reactions to Customer Incivility. In: Journal of Service Research. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 120-134.
@article{4484bc8a62554354a335bd753acc2392,
title = "The Social Dimension of Service Interactions: Observer Reactions to Customer Incivility",
abstract = "Service interactions run a gamut from an instrumental self-focus to full social appreciation. Observing another customer’s incivility toward a frontline employee can emphasize social concerns as guiding principles for the observer’s own service interaction. Five studies test these dynamics; the results reveal that an incivility incident leads observers to prioritize social over market concerns. This reprioritization becomes manifest in a subsequent service interaction through increased feelings of warmth toward the employee who experienced incivility. In turn, feelings of warmth prompt observers to provide emotional support to the affected employee. Yet such prosocial inclinations are less likely when an employee is held responsible for or reciprocates incivility. Finally, this article also examines the effects of different employee reaction strategies on observers’ inferences about the employee and the service firm, showing that observers are most positively disposed toward the employee and the firm when the former reacts to incivility with a polite reprimand. Together, the results suggest that, contrary to past theorizing, observing customers may contribute to employee well-being, contingent on appropriate employee responses. Notably, the commonly prescribed polite, submissive employee reaction that requires emotional labor may not be the most desirable reaction—neither for the employee nor for the firm.",
keywords = "customer incivility, third-party observers, employee reaction, market versus social mind set, consumer misbehavior",
author = "A.P. Henkel and Johannes Boegershausen and Anat Rafaeli and Jos Lemmink",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094670516685179",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "120--134",
journal = "Journal of Service Research",
issn = "1094-6705",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

The Social Dimension of Service Interactions : Observer Reactions to Customer Incivility. / Henkel, A.P.; Boegershausen, Johannes; Rafaeli, Anat; Lemmink, Jos.

In: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 120-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Social Dimension of Service Interactions

T2 - Observer Reactions to Customer Incivility

AU - Henkel, A.P.

AU - Boegershausen, Johannes

AU - Rafaeli, Anat

AU - Lemmink, Jos

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Service interactions run a gamut from an instrumental self-focus to full social appreciation. Observing another customer’s incivility toward a frontline employee can emphasize social concerns as guiding principles for the observer’s own service interaction. Five studies test these dynamics; the results reveal that an incivility incident leads observers to prioritize social over market concerns. This reprioritization becomes manifest in a subsequent service interaction through increased feelings of warmth toward the employee who experienced incivility. In turn, feelings of warmth prompt observers to provide emotional support to the affected employee. Yet such prosocial inclinations are less likely when an employee is held responsible for or reciprocates incivility. Finally, this article also examines the effects of different employee reaction strategies on observers’ inferences about the employee and the service firm, showing that observers are most positively disposed toward the employee and the firm when the former reacts to incivility with a polite reprimand. Together, the results suggest that, contrary to past theorizing, observing customers may contribute to employee well-being, contingent on appropriate employee responses. Notably, the commonly prescribed polite, submissive employee reaction that requires emotional labor may not be the most desirable reaction—neither for the employee nor for the firm.

AB - Service interactions run a gamut from an instrumental self-focus to full social appreciation. Observing another customer’s incivility toward a frontline employee can emphasize social concerns as guiding principles for the observer’s own service interaction. Five studies test these dynamics; the results reveal that an incivility incident leads observers to prioritize social over market concerns. This reprioritization becomes manifest in a subsequent service interaction through increased feelings of warmth toward the employee who experienced incivility. In turn, feelings of warmth prompt observers to provide emotional support to the affected employee. Yet such prosocial inclinations are less likely when an employee is held responsible for or reciprocates incivility. Finally, this article also examines the effects of different employee reaction strategies on observers’ inferences about the employee and the service firm, showing that observers are most positively disposed toward the employee and the firm when the former reacts to incivility with a polite reprimand. Together, the results suggest that, contrary to past theorizing, observing customers may contribute to employee well-being, contingent on appropriate employee responses. Notably, the commonly prescribed polite, submissive employee reaction that requires emotional labor may not be the most desirable reaction—neither for the employee nor for the firm.

KW - customer incivility

KW - third-party observers

KW - employee reaction

KW - market versus social mind set

KW - consumer misbehavior

U2 - 10.1177/1094670516685179

DO - 10.1177/1094670516685179

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 120

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Service Research

JF - Journal of Service Research

SN - 1094-6705

IS - 2

ER -