TY - JOUR
T1 - The study demands and resources scale
T2 - psychometric properties, longitudinal invariance, and criterion validity
AU - van Zyl, Llewellyn E.
AU - Shankland, Rebecca
AU - Klibert, Jeff
AU - Verger, Nicolas B.
AU - Rothmann, Sebastiaan
AU - Cho, Vincent
AU - Feng, Katherine
AU - See-To, Eric W.K.
AU - Roll, Lara C.
AU - Ghosh, Anindita
AU - van der Meij, Leander
AU - Arijs, Diane
AU - Cole, Matthew L.
AU - Stavros, Jacqueline M.
AU - Hulshof, Inge L.
AU - Di Blasi, Zelda
AU - De Beer, Leon T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 van Zyl, Shankland, Klibert, Verger, Rothmann, Cho, Feng, See-To, Roll, Ghosh, van der Meij, Arijs, Cole, Stavros, Hulshof, Di Blasi and De Beer.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Study Demands and Resources Scale (SDRS) has shown promise as a valid and reliable measure for measuring students’ specific study demands and -resources. However, there is no evidence as to its psychometric properties outside of the original context in which it was developed. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the SDRS in a cross-national student population through examining its longitudinal factorial validity, internal consistency, and temporal invariance as well as criterion validity through its association with study engagement and task performance over time. Results showed that a Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Model (ESEM) with one general factor (overall study characteristics) and five specific factors (workload, growth opportunities, lecturer support, peer support, information availability) fitted the data, showed strong measurement invariance over time, and was reliable at different time points. The study further established criterion validity for the overall study characteristics factor through its concurrent and predictive associations with study engagement and task performance. However, the specific factors’ concurrent and predictive capacity could only partially be established when controlling for the general study characteristics factor. These findings suggest that study characteristics should be measured as a dynamic interaction between study demands and resources, rather than a hierarchical model.
AB - The Study Demands and Resources Scale (SDRS) has shown promise as a valid and reliable measure for measuring students’ specific study demands and -resources. However, there is no evidence as to its psychometric properties outside of the original context in which it was developed. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the SDRS in a cross-national student population through examining its longitudinal factorial validity, internal consistency, and temporal invariance as well as criterion validity through its association with study engagement and task performance over time. Results showed that a Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Model (ESEM) with one general factor (overall study characteristics) and five specific factors (workload, growth opportunities, lecturer support, peer support, information availability) fitted the data, showed strong measurement invariance over time, and was reliable at different time points. The study further established criterion validity for the overall study characteristics factor through its concurrent and predictive associations with study engagement and task performance. However, the specific factors’ concurrent and predictive capacity could only partially be established when controlling for the general study characteristics factor. These findings suggest that study characteristics should be measured as a dynamic interaction between study demands and resources, rather than a hierarchical model.
KW - exploratory structural equation modelling
KW - longitudinal invariance and criterion validity study demands
KW - psychometric properties
KW - study resources
KW - university students
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2024.1409099
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2024.1409099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85195653316
SN - 2504-284X
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
M1 - 1409099
ER -