The style it takes

how do UK universities communicate their identity through welcome addresses?

Jeroen Huisman*, Jelle Mampaey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In times when universities are becoming less self-evident, these organisations may be confounded in terms of which aspects of their activities and performances they should communicate with their stakeholders. A related question - central to our study - is how they communicate. This paper analyses the style of one particular type of communication: welcome addresses of key spokespersons of UK universities. Building on the pertinent image and identity literature and using Speech Act Theory, we expected to find differences between universities by prestige and age and over time. We found that older universities use different styles compared to younger universities, and that there were also differences by prestige. We also found considerable changes over time. The findings suggest we should not see these welcome addresses as purely ceremonial, but as intentional messages with communication styles that reflect the organisational attributes of the university.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-515
Number of pages14
JournalHigher Education Research & Development
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • communication
  • image
  • Speech Act Theory
  • UK
  • universities
  • HIGHER-EDUCATION
  • IMAGE
  • MANAGERIALISM
  • CAPITALISM
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • ACADEMIA

Cite this

@article{6eef280a1899404e9a7b7e72aa0d142f,
title = "The style it takes: how do UK universities communicate their identity through welcome addresses?",
abstract = "In times when universities are becoming less self-evident, these organisations may be confounded in terms of which aspects of their activities and performances they should communicate with their stakeholders. A related question - central to our study - is how they communicate. This paper analyses the style of one particular type of communication: welcome addresses of key spokespersons of UK universities. Building on the pertinent image and identity literature and using Speech Act Theory, we expected to find differences between universities by prestige and age and over time. We found that older universities use different styles compared to younger universities, and that there were also differences by prestige. We also found considerable changes over time. The findings suggest we should not see these welcome addresses as purely ceremonial, but as intentional messages with communication styles that reflect the organisational attributes of the university.",
keywords = "communication, image, Speech Act Theory, UK, universities, HIGHER-EDUCATION, IMAGE, MANAGERIALISM, CAPITALISM, KNOWLEDGE, ACADEMIA",
author = "Jeroen Huisman and Jelle Mampaey",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2015.1107889",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "502--515",
journal = "Higher Education Research & Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "3",

}

The style it takes : how do UK universities communicate their identity through welcome addresses? / Huisman, Jeroen; Mampaey, Jelle.

In: Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2016, p. 502-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The style it takes

T2 - how do UK universities communicate their identity through welcome addresses?

AU - Huisman, Jeroen

AU - Mampaey, Jelle

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In times when universities are becoming less self-evident, these organisations may be confounded in terms of which aspects of their activities and performances they should communicate with their stakeholders. A related question - central to our study - is how they communicate. This paper analyses the style of one particular type of communication: welcome addresses of key spokespersons of UK universities. Building on the pertinent image and identity literature and using Speech Act Theory, we expected to find differences between universities by prestige and age and over time. We found that older universities use different styles compared to younger universities, and that there were also differences by prestige. We also found considerable changes over time. The findings suggest we should not see these welcome addresses as purely ceremonial, but as intentional messages with communication styles that reflect the organisational attributes of the university.

AB - In times when universities are becoming less self-evident, these organisations may be confounded in terms of which aspects of their activities and performances they should communicate with their stakeholders. A related question - central to our study - is how they communicate. This paper analyses the style of one particular type of communication: welcome addresses of key spokespersons of UK universities. Building on the pertinent image and identity literature and using Speech Act Theory, we expected to find differences between universities by prestige and age and over time. We found that older universities use different styles compared to younger universities, and that there were also differences by prestige. We also found considerable changes over time. The findings suggest we should not see these welcome addresses as purely ceremonial, but as intentional messages with communication styles that reflect the organisational attributes of the university.

KW - communication

KW - image

KW - Speech Act Theory

KW - UK

KW - universities

KW - HIGHER-EDUCATION

KW - IMAGE

KW - MANAGERIALISM

KW - CAPITALISM

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - ACADEMIA

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107889

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2015.1107889

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 502

EP - 515

JO - Higher Education Research & Development

JF - Higher Education Research & Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 3

ER -