The Texas Sharpshooter in the Three Grand Tours (1933-2013): No Evidence for Superior Time Trial Performances in de "Epo Era"

Hein F.M. Lodewijkx, P. Verboon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies examining effects of doping in professional road racing building on archival records of the three major European stage races—the Tour de France, Giro d’Italia, and Vuelta a España—concluded that riders’ final performances in the “epo era” (>1990) strongly improved, yet declined since 2004. These observations can be criticized. First, we argue that time trial performances are more valid than final performances to indirectly evaluate doping effects. Second, we will pay attention to an informal logical flaw—the Texas sharpshooter fallacy—which may have biased findings and conclusions presented in the studies. To empirically substantiate our critique, we analyzed mean kilometers per hour (km/h) performances realized by winning riders in all time trials on flat and rolling terrain in the three tours (1933-2013, N = 325). Regression analyses revealed no evidence for nonlinear in- or decreases in riders’ speed beyond the 1990s, but a straightforward linear progress over time of b = 0.16 km/h per year (R2 = 0.50, p ≤ 0.001). Findings corroborate our comments on previous archival studies and qualify opinions about effects of the “epo epidemic” on cyclists’ achievements, since the time trial performances delivered in these years are no exemption to the observed linear progress in speed.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1045
Number of pages12
JournalOpen Access Library Journal
Volume1
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Fingerprint

performance
evidence
exemption
time
France
road
regression

Keywords

  • Epo doping
  • Multi-Stage Cycling Races
  • Professional Road Racing
  • Time Trials

Cite this

@article{1cb4ace0154240548588657aadd495fa,
title = "The Texas Sharpshooter in the Three Grand Tours (1933-2013): No Evidence for Superior Time Trial Performances in de {"}Epo Era{"}",
abstract = "Studies examining effects of doping in professional road racing building on archival records of the three major European stage races—the Tour de France, Giro d’Italia, and Vuelta a Espa{\~n}a—concluded that riders’ final performances in the “epo era” (>1990) strongly improved, yet declined since 2004. These observations can be criticized. First, we argue that time trial performances are more valid than final performances to indirectly evaluate doping effects. Second, we will pay attention to an informal logical flaw—the Texas sharpshooter fallacy—which may have biased findings and conclusions presented in the studies. To empirically substantiate our critique, we analyzed mean kilometers per hour (km/h) performances realized by winning riders in all time trials on flat and rolling terrain in the three tours (1933-2013, N = 325). Regression analyses revealed no evidence for nonlinear in- or decreases in riders’ speed beyond the 1990s, but a straightforward linear progress over time of b = 0.16 km/h per year (R2 = 0.50, p ≤ 0.001). Findings corroborate our comments on previous archival studies and qualify opinions about effects of the “epo epidemic” on cyclists’ achievements, since the time trial performances delivered in these years are no exemption to the observed linear progress in speed.",
keywords = "Epo doping, Multi-Stage Cycling Races, Professional Road Racing, Time Trials",
author = "Lodewijkx, {Hein F.M.} and P. Verboon",
note = "exported from refbase (http://publicaties.ou.nl/show.php?record=1326), last updated on Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:29:00 +0200",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.4236/oalib.1101045",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Open Access Library Journal",
issn = "2333-9705",
publisher = "Open Access Library Inc.",
number = "8",

}

The Texas Sharpshooter in the Three Grand Tours (1933-2013): No Evidence for Superior Time Trial Performances in de "Epo Era". / Lodewijkx, Hein F.M.; Verboon, P.

In: Open Access Library Journal, Vol. 1, No. 8, e1045, 11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Texas Sharpshooter in the Three Grand Tours (1933-2013): No Evidence for Superior Time Trial Performances in de "Epo Era"

AU - Lodewijkx, Hein F.M.

AU - Verboon, P.

N1 - exported from refbase (http://publicaties.ou.nl/show.php?record=1326), last updated on Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:29:00 +0200

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Studies examining effects of doping in professional road racing building on archival records of the three major European stage races—the Tour de France, Giro d’Italia, and Vuelta a España—concluded that riders’ final performances in the “epo era” (>1990) strongly improved, yet declined since 2004. These observations can be criticized. First, we argue that time trial performances are more valid than final performances to indirectly evaluate doping effects. Second, we will pay attention to an informal logical flaw—the Texas sharpshooter fallacy—which may have biased findings and conclusions presented in the studies. To empirically substantiate our critique, we analyzed mean kilometers per hour (km/h) performances realized by winning riders in all time trials on flat and rolling terrain in the three tours (1933-2013, N = 325). Regression analyses revealed no evidence for nonlinear in- or decreases in riders’ speed beyond the 1990s, but a straightforward linear progress over time of b = 0.16 km/h per year (R2 = 0.50, p ≤ 0.001). Findings corroborate our comments on previous archival studies and qualify opinions about effects of the “epo epidemic” on cyclists’ achievements, since the time trial performances delivered in these years are no exemption to the observed linear progress in speed.

AB - Studies examining effects of doping in professional road racing building on archival records of the three major European stage races—the Tour de France, Giro d’Italia, and Vuelta a España—concluded that riders’ final performances in the “epo era” (>1990) strongly improved, yet declined since 2004. These observations can be criticized. First, we argue that time trial performances are more valid than final performances to indirectly evaluate doping effects. Second, we will pay attention to an informal logical flaw—the Texas sharpshooter fallacy—which may have biased findings and conclusions presented in the studies. To empirically substantiate our critique, we analyzed mean kilometers per hour (km/h) performances realized by winning riders in all time trials on flat and rolling terrain in the three tours (1933-2013, N = 325). Regression analyses revealed no evidence for nonlinear in- or decreases in riders’ speed beyond the 1990s, but a straightforward linear progress over time of b = 0.16 km/h per year (R2 = 0.50, p ≤ 0.001). Findings corroborate our comments on previous archival studies and qualify opinions about effects of the “epo epidemic” on cyclists’ achievements, since the time trial performances delivered in these years are no exemption to the observed linear progress in speed.

KW - Epo doping

KW - Multi-Stage Cycling Races

KW - Professional Road Racing

KW - Time Trials

U2 - 10.4236/oalib.1101045

DO - 10.4236/oalib.1101045

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Open Access Library Journal

JF - Open Access Library Journal

SN - 2333-9705

IS - 8

M1 - e1045

ER -